Impact of M&A on the R&D process. An empirical analysis of the role of technological and market relatedness, The

By Bruno Cassiman, Massimo G. Colombo, Paola Garrone, Reinhilde Veugelers. 2003

519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0091997cc301a5926b976cad1bd4a6071c3da6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “processes undertaken with the aim of market access or for other motives (Cantwell & Mudambi 2005; Cassiman et al. 2005; Hakanson 1995; Mukherjee et al. 2004).”
Do High Technology Acquirers Become More Innovative (2010, methodology): “The present work has shown that acquirer attributes help to explain the observed variance in acquisition outcomes, over and above the explanatory power of dealspecific characteristics (e.g. Ahuja and Katila, 2001; Cassiman et al., 2005; Cloodt et al., 2006).”
Competitors' Resource-Oriented Strategies: Acting Upon Competitors' Resources Through Interventions in Factor Markets and Political Markets (2008, unknown): “Recent research has started to emphasize the role of power in firms’ boundary decisions (Santos & Eisenhardt, 2005) and to account for firms’ actions in the market for resources that constitute a mix of power and efficiency rationales (Cassiman et al., 2003; Santos & Eisenhardt, 2004).”
Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions (2009, background): “M&As that integrate highly similar technologies narrow the range of potential learning and also reduce the incentives to explore divergent research opportunities available from M&As. Cassiman et al. (2005) found that firms are more likely to reduce research and development (R&D) effort, shorten the ”
The Challenge of Integration: A Review of the M&A Integration Literature (2017, background): “Too strong an overlap provides little opportunity for learning (Cassiman et al. 2005); too little overlap means that the firms lack the absorptive capacity necessary to put the knowledge of the respective other firm to productive use (Cohen and Levinthal 1994; Desyllas and Hughes 2010; Lin and Jang…”
R&D and M&A : Are cross-border M&A different ? An investigation on OECD countries (2006, background): “same technology field ( Cassiman et al 2004 ).”
Cross-Border M&As and Innovative Activity of Acquiring and Target Firms (2016, background): “Empirical evidence on the effects of international M&As is so far mostly limited to target firms and has yielded mixed results as well. 15 For instance, Guadalupe et al. (2012) find that foreign acquisitions are accompanied by techno logy upgrading in acquisition targets in Spain and that this effec”
Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries (2006, background): “The unification of two knowledge bases can provide opportunities for synergies in future RD Hall, 1990).”
Product-service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity (2019, unknown): “, 2013; Kohtamäki and Partanen, 2016), evidence on technological strategic collaborations’ impact on firm performance is inconclusive and contradictory (Cassiman et al., 2005).”
M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective (2016, background): “International Business Review (2014), h Cassiman et al., 2005) or the role of knowledge bases for postM&A innovative performance (e.g. Cloodt et al., 2006).”
How Swiss small and medium-sized firms assess the performance impact of mergers and acquisitions (2013, unknown): “The evidence from similar studies is mixed. Capron (1999), Sharma and Ho (2002) and Dutton and Jog (2009) found no effect of (market-)relatedn ess on the economic performance of M&As.”