Factor-Market Rivalry
By Gideon D. Markman, Peter T. Gianiodis, Ann Buchholtz. 2009
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c3e7c2118ad48932b692d2dba19db5a04601702
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Gideon D. Markman
- Peter T. Gianiodis
- Miles A. Zachary
- Tieying Yu
- G. Tyge Payne
- David Miller
- Ming-Jer Chen
- Scott C. Ellis
Citations in the corpus
- Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: : A multidimensional framework (2015, background): “For example, should firms first develop complementary “supply side” relationships with factor suppliers (Markman et al., 2009) and providers of human and intellectual capital to build up core capabilities and expand the cooperative network? Or should they work on the “demand side” (Peteraf and Berge”
- A Comprehensive Review of Multimarket Competition Research (2013, background): “In an important theoretical article, Markman, Gianiodis, and Buchholtz (2009) argued that rivalry can flare up at any level— from upstream and primary activities to downstream and support activities.”
- Entry Timing (2015, background): “For example, some firms mobilize resources to displace early movers in product markets (Markman et al., 2009), whereas others choose to forfeit a first-mover position but use speed capabilities to catch up with, and even leapfrog, first entrants (Hawk et al., 2013).”
- Advancing a Typology of Open Innovation (2010, background): “R&D), as well as product and service offerings (Markman et al., 2009b).”