Determinants of rural and urban family firm resilience

By K. Brewton, S. Danes, K. Stafford, G. Haynes. 2010

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a85381b569c05c6ddd7c23993dfb00b4047f30e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Tommaso Minola
2. Philipp Sieger
3. Joshua J. Daspit
4. Nicholas E. Evangelopoulos
5. James J. Chrisman
6. Triss Ashton
7. Alfredo De Massis
8. Thomas M. Zellweger

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Philipp Sieger
2. Tommaso Minola
3. Joshua J. Daspit
4. Nicholas E. Evangelopoulos
5. Triss Ashton
6. James J. Chrisman
7. Alfredo De Massis
8. Thomas M. Zellweger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joshua J. Daspit
2. James J. Chrisman
3. Tommaso Minola
4. Philipp Sieger

Citations in the corpus

• The Family's Financial Support as a “Poisoned Gift”: A Family Embeddedness Perspective on Entrepreneurial Intentions (2017, background): “Several control variables are significant, such as age (negatively) and having entrepreneurial parents; 5The agricultural sector can be characterized by long-term and stable returns (Brewton et al. 2010) which should be appealing to family members who might provide financial support.”
• Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward (2021, background): “Brewton et al. (2010) determined that social capital and the number of prior disruptions experienced explain part of the variation in family firm survivability capital, yet this was true only for rural, and not urban, family firms in their study.”