Affect, Relationality and the `Problem of Personality'

By L. Blackman. 2008

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a4460ce8a423c98ebcee38d6ffc9f3672e24315

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. Dianne Mulcahy
2. Nikolas Rose
3. M. Fotaki
4. Sheena J. Vachhani
5. L. Blackman
6. Kate Kenny

In Geography, Planning and Development

1. Dianne Mulcahy
2. Nikolas Rose

In Philosophy

1. Dianne Mulcahy
2. Nikolas Rose
3. L. Blackman
4. M. Wetherell

Citations in the corpus

• Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters (2017, background): “While these authors do not neglect the factors leading to the social and political conditioning of affect, their focus is the neurophysiological and psychological aspects of affect transmission that exceed a singular body, aiming to better understand relationality (Blackman, 2008a).”
• Affective assemblages: body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classrooms (2012, background): “It affords recognition of the idea that materiality is governed by relations of indeterminacy, contingency and openness (Blackman 2008) and that far from being passive or inert, matter is a lively force that actively participates in events (Bennett 2010).”
• Embodying Affect: Voice-hearing, Telepathy, Suggestion and Modelling the Non-conscious (2010, background): “…of chemical entrainment that is a possible agent for the transmission of affect.11 I have written elsewhere about how Brennan dismisses suggestion and a hypnotic paradigm as mere rhetoric (Blackman, 2008a), although a considerable amount of work that she draws on is indebted to such a paradigm.”
• The Human Sciences in a Biological Age (2013, background): “…theorists and feminist philosophers have come to realize that it is not reactionary to recognize the reality of our fleshly nature, and to examine the possibilities and constraints that flow from it (Blackman, 2008, 2010; Braidotti, 2002; Grosz, 1994; Massumi, 2002; Thrift, 2007; Wilson, 2004b).”
• Body, Image and Affect in Consumer Culture (2010, unknown): “The alleged ‘affective turn’ draws on the work of Spinoza, Bergson, Deleuze and Guattari, Damasio, Massumi and others (see Blackman, 2008; Buchanan, 1997; Clough, 2007, 2008; Damasio, 1994, 1999, 2003; Hansen, 2004a; Hemmings, 2005; Papoulias and Callard, 2010 [this issue]; Shouse, 2005).”