A typology of mixed methods research designs

By Nancy L. Leech, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2009

1,747 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a27d3431819480bf26786cbd65c7e1007aa404d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In General Health Professions

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, methodology): “, the accuracy of what researchers report) by providing information about the research setting (see earlier discussion about data-collection strategies) (Maxwell, 1992). To ensure study 1’s credibility and transparency (i.e., the extent to which qualitative research’s results are credible and believ”
A Mixed Research Investigation of Factors Related to Time to the Doctorate in Education (2011, methodology): “A partially mixed sequential dominant status design (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009) was employed whereby the quantitative phase preceded the qualitative phase (see Figure 1).”
Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, methodology): “Thus, it is somewhat disturbing that a dearth of mixed research studies has been published in the counseling literature (Hanson, Creswell, Plano Clark, Petska, & Creswell, 2005; Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009a).”
Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential (2011, background): “Other advantages of mixed methods research are its attempts to fully respect the contribution and wisdom of both the qualitative and quantitative viewpoints, and to seek a workable middle solution for addressing divergent research problems (Johnson et al. 2007; Leech and Onwuegbuzie 2009; Niaz 2008;”
Twice-Exceptional Learners: Effects of Teacher Preparation and Disability Labels on Gifted Referrals (2010, methodology): “This mixed methods study employed a fully mixed concurrent equal-status design (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009).”
What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Use (2019, background): “Conceptual development of ‘explainability’ proceeded throughout the interviews (Leech and Onwuegbuzie, 2009) to guide subsequent interview content Jacob and Furgerson (2012).”
The project-based learning approach in environmental education (2015, methodology): “Mixed research involves collecting qualitative and quantitative data relating to basic facts within a single study or a series of studies, analyzing the data and interpreting it (Fraenkel, Wallen, & Hyun, 2012; Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009).”
The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences (2011, methodology): “Adapting Leech and Onwuegbuzie (2009) three-dimensional typology of mixed methods designs, our study was a partially mixed sequential equal status multiple-case study design (P3).”
Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods (2011, background): “It was not surprising that much of the emphasis of Lincoln and Guba’s (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry is a justification for, and not an explana tion of, this kind of study.”
Gifted Girls: Gender Bias in Gifted Referrals (2011, methodology): “This study is a fully mixed concurrent equal status design mixed methods study (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009).”
The Value of Mixed Methods Designs to Social Justice Research in Counseling and Psychology (2013, background): “Though there other typologies or classifications of mixed methods designs (e.g., Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009; Onwuegbuzie & Collins, 2007; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006), it is the organizing system of Hanson et al. (2005) that has guided a majority of recent human services-focused mixed methods…”
Beyond Words: Using Nonverbal Communication Data in Research to Enhance Thick Description and Interpretation (2013, background): “…dominant, with the less-dominant quantitative phase preceding the qualitative phase, yielding a qualitative-dominant mixed research design (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Johnson, Onwuegbuzie, & Turner, 2007)—specifically, a fully mixed sequential dominant status design (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009).”