The Value of Mixed Methods Designs to Social Justice Research in Counseling and Psychology
By J. Ponterotto, Jaya Mathew, Brigid C. Raughley. 2013
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This article highlights the potential value of mixed methods designs for social justice research in counseling, psychology, and related human services professions. Though representing only a small minority of research designs used in these fields, mixed methods approaches are gaining in popularity. A rationale for the use of mixed methods research in the human services generally, and multicultural/social justice counseling specifically, is presented. Various mixed methods designs are reviewed, examples of published mixed methods multicultural research are highlighted, and a flow diagram to determine whether or not to incorporate a mixed method design for a particular study is put forth. Limitations of mixed methods designs are also acknowledged.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/892c0725a541b1c40f86e4da9532e4981253dbe9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- “You Never Become Fully Independent”: Family Roles and Independence in First-Generation College Students (2018, background): “In addition, the interviewer was able to modify questions and delve deeper into certain themes that reoccurred in previous interviews (Ponterotto et al., 2013).”