The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms
By David J. Teece, Gary P. Pisano. 2003
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9950fa98c346e133e563ca7b906c44e77bcdd310
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- S. Hunt
- Selin Dilli
- Usama Awan
- Bettina Peters
- D. Arnett
- Andrzej Kraslawski
- Maryann P. Feldman
- Janne Huiskonen
Citations in the corpus
- Market Segmentation Strategy, Competitive Advantage, and Public Policy: Grounding Segmentation Strategy in Resource-Advantage Theory (2004, background): “…the firm, which traces to Penrose (1959), Wernerfelt (1984), Conner (1991), and Barney (1991), parallels, if not undergirds, what Foss (1993) calls the “competence perspective” in evolutionary economics and the “capabilities” approaches of Teece and Pisano (1994) and Langlois and Robertson (1995).”
- Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “To identify the core of institutions that are most influential to any kind of business activity, the VoC literature (Hall and Soskice 2001a: 6-9) draws on the fundamental insights of economic theory (Williamson 1985; Milgrom and Robers 1992; Teece and Pisano 1998) and the resourcedependence view (Pf”
- Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence (2009, background): “”success breeds success” theories since technological capabilities might substantiate sustained competitive advantages ( Teece and Pisano 1994 ).”
- Determinants of International Activities: Are SMEs Different? (2005, background): “…(e.g. the “network perspective of internationalisation” or the “Born Global” literature) as well as by further developing more evolutionary concepts of the firm (from the resource-based concept of the firm (e.g. Wernerfelt, 1984) to the “dynamic capability view” (e.g. Teece and Pisano, 1998)).”
- A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines (2003, background): “From a resource-based perspective, routines contribute to the dynamic capability of firms (Teece and Pisano, 1994; Teece et al., 1997) and the ability of firms to regenerate (Tranfield and Smith, 1998).”
- The impact of relational governance on performance improvement in export manufacturing firms (2018, background): “The literature suggests that firm develop process and reconfiguration capability is embedded in coordination and sharing and processing of -351- knowledge and information (Teece & Pisano 2004).”