The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements

By P. Knoeferle, Matthew W. Crocker. 2007

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world (2016, unknown): “Indeed, the idea that working memory may be important for language–vision interactions is not new (Huettig, Olivers, & Hartsuiker, 2011; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007; cf. Spivey, Richardson, & Fitneva, 2004).”
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing (2009, methodology): “This account does not require an external mechanism (e.g., working memory; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007), because attention is instantiated within the same representational substrate as linguistic and nonlinguistic information (see also Cohen, AstonJones, & Gilzenrat, 2004); in other words, different…”