Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews

By Nicolas Roulin, Adrian Bangerter, J. Levashina. 2014

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/985f09e2fd907aad15b7267ab74e1bd91417ec15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Nicolas Roulin
2. Adrian Bangerter
3. J. Levashina

In Social Psychology

1. Nicolas Roulin
2. Adrian Bangerter
3. J. Levashina

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nicolas Roulin
2. Adrian Bangerter
3. J. Levashina

Citations in the corpus

• Examining Digital Interviews for Personnel Selection: Applicant Reactions and Interviewer Ratings (2017, unknown): “According to previous arguments and findings (Blacksmith et al., 2016; Ingold et al., 2015; Roulin et al., 2014), digital interviews should lead to lower interview ratings than videoconference interviews because they are even less interactive and there is less opportunity for impression management…”
• Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: : Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations? (2015, background): “We know of only two field studies that have explored IM detection by examining interviewers’ perceptions of applicant IM use and comparing them to applicants’ reported IM use (Roulin et al., 2014; Stevens & Kristof, 1995).”