What You Don't Know Won't Hurt Me:Impression Management Functions of Communication Channels in Relationships

By Patrick B. O'Sullivan. 2000

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/983c2b95604858af9130acc377cdd154d70e564a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Preliminary Development of a Model and Measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Competence (2006, background): “…& Walther, 2002), effectiveness (Campbell & Neer, 2001; Tidwell & Walther, 2002), accuracy or coorientation (Kayany, Wotring, & Forrest, 1996; O’Sullivan, 2000), learning outcomes (Althaus, 1997; Brandon & Hollingshead, 1999; Hiltz, 1986), relationship intimacy (Parks & Floyd, 1996; Parks &…”
Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale (2017, background): “As such, asynchronicity is associated with a form of expressive or communicative control (Feaster, 2010; O ’ Sullivan, 2000; Reid & Reid, 2010; Schouten et al., 2007; also referred to as interaction management, Walther & Parks, 2002).”
A Social Skill Account of Problematic Internet Use (2005, methodology): “O’Sullivan (2000) maintained that CMC represents a useful tool “for managing self-relevant information in pursuit of self-presentational goals (p. 404).”
Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model (2006, background): “Controllability may allow adolescents greater control over their self-presentation (McKenna & Bargh, 2000; O’Sullivan, 2000; Walther, 1996).”
On‐line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively internet‐based and primarily internet‐based relationships (2004, background): “While many studies have examined how relationships are initially formed on-line, and how various perceptions of on-line partners influence different aspects of relationships, such as their development, impression management, and relational norms (Baym, 2000; O'Sullivan, 2000; Preece, 1998; Walther, ”
Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness (2011, background): “Online communication scholars have long considered the antecedents and outcomes of identity formation and self presentation enacted via OSD (O’Sullivan, 2000; Turkle, 1995), with several studies reporting that communicators often self-disclose more online than they do when face to face (Ho &…”
Overcoming the "Ideology of Openness": Probing the Affordances of Social Media for Organizational Knowledge Sharing (2013, background): “While prior research on technology use has emphasized its strategic affordances (Birnholtz, Bi, & Fussell, 2012; Birnholtz et al., 2012; Leonardi & Treem, 2012; O’Sullivan, 2000; Walther, 2007), it has not studied social media per se but rather communication media in general, including e-mail, insta”
College Students' Motivations for Facebook Use and Psychological Outcomes (2014, background): “For example, Raacke and Bonds-Raacke (2008) showed that some popular gratification needs for SNSs were keeping in touch with friends, making new friends and locating old friends, and posting/viewing pictures.”
Putting the “self” in selfies: how narcissism, envy and self-promotion motivate sharing of travel photos through social media (2020, methodology): “Social media provides the technology to use computer-mediated communications for enhanced self-presentations (O’Sullivan, 2000; Walther, 1996).”