Cyberbullying: causes, effects, and remedies
By Dianne L. Hoff, Sidney N. Mitchell. 2009
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97cfcae0fd8e424397613aa82d5b7473af1a9f0f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
- Chuang Wang
- Paul Benjamin Lowry
- Mikko T. Siponen
- Jun Zhang
- Yavuz Akbulut
- Rosario Del Rey
- Faye Mishna
In Education
- Mona Khoury-Kassabri
- Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
- Chuang Wang
- Paul Benjamin Lowry
- Mikko T. Siponen
- Jun Zhang
- Tiffany Melioli
- Charles E. Notar
In Social Psychology
- Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
- Chuang Wang
- Paul Benjamin Lowry
- Mikko T. Siponen
- Jun Zhang
- Vassilis Barkoukis
- Charles E. Notar
- Haralambos Tsorbatzoudis
Citations in the corpus
- Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? (2016, background): “But as in traditional bullying, cyberbullying victims suffer adverse psychological consequences, including psychopathological symptoms, suicide thoughts and attempts, social isolation, and problems in school (Hinduja & Patchin, 2009; Hoff & Mitchell, 2009).”
- Risk Factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies, and bully-victims (2012, background): “Cyber bullying often occurs in the context of social relationships (Hoff & Mitchell, 2008; Mishna, Saini, & Solomon, 2009; National Children's Home, 2002) which challenges the commonly held assumption that it is anonymous (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008, 2009; Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Shariff, 2009) and…”
- Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature. (2013, background): “…commonly from relationship problems (break-ups, envy, intolerance, and ganging up); victims experience powerfully negative effects (especially on their social well-being); and the reactive behavior from schools and students is generally inappropriate, absent, or ineffective (Hoff & Mitchell, 2009).”
- Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students (2011, background): “The distribution of the reasons could be considered parallel to the findings of Hoff and Mitchell (2009) maintaining that cyberbullying emerged mostly from interpersonal problems (e.g. envy, intolerance).”
- Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, background): “…yes (2.777 ) no self-report cyberbullying no teenagers (12th grade) Random sample survey of 4400 12th grade students on their thoughts on cyberbullying Hoff and Mitchell (2009) (q) no no cyberbullying incidents no university (range 18–24) 351 students in a public research University in New England…”
- The Relationship Between Body Image Concerns, Eating Disorders and Internet Use, Part I: A Review of Empirical Support (2016, background): “Cyberbullying is highly prevalent among adolescents, and almost 90 % of teenagers reporting knowing a friend who had been targeted (Hoff and Mitchell 2009).”
- Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying (2013, neutral): “…and more interpersonal, behavioural and physical problems (Baker & Tanrikulu, 2010; Beran & Li, 2007; Breguet, 2007; Didden et al., 2009; Hoff & Mitchell, 2009; Katzer, Fetchenhauer, & Belschak, 2009; Mishna, McLuckie, & Saini, 2009; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Raskauskas, 2010; Tokunaga,…”