In and out of the labour market: long-term income consequences of child-related interruptions to women's paid work

By S. Phipps, P. Burton, L. Lethbridge. 2001

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96f9e3c2041e7e578ddf24839a654f25646c3a82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. J. Gornick
2. Sylvia Fuller
3. C. Hirsh
4. A. Hegewisch
5. Sarah Thébaud

In General Health Professions

1. Sylvia Fuller
2. C. Hirsh

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Gornick
2. Sylvia Fuller
3. C. Hirsh
4. A. Hegewisch
5. Sarah Thébaud

Citations in the corpus

• “Family-Friendly” Jobs and Motherhood Pay Penalties: The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements Across the Educational Spectrum (2019, background): “If breaks are longer than statutory protected leaves, they also force women to find new employers when they re-enter the labor force, reducing seniority and firm-specific capital, and leading to larger wage losses (Baum, 2002; Bishop, 1997; Phipps et al., 2001).”
• The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: a review of research from OECD countries (2011, background): “Phipps, Burton, and Lethbridge ( 2001 ) examine the wage gap in Canada between mothers and women without children; they find that neither time out of the labor market nor reduced productivity after return to birth (hypothesizing that a dual workload at home and in employment might reduce attention a”