The Effect of National Context on Perceptions of Risk: A Comparison of Planned Versus Free-Market Managers

By Mona V. Makhija, Alice C. Stewart. 2002

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96f74244457c1ca87db9fe4eae6e9e26c2431eff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

International business responses to institutional voids (2017, background): “…way, institutional voids have the capacity to shed important light on key issues that concern international business scholars, such as the effects of institutions on innovation (Carney, Dieleman, & Taussig, 2016), foreign direct investment (Meyer & Peng, 2016), and risks (Makhija & Stewart, 2002).”
Do International Networks and Foreign Market Knowledge Facilitate SME Internationalization? Evidence from the Czech Republic (2014, background): “Given this scenario, and based on the experiences of scholars involved in research pertaining to transition economies (e.g., Ellis, 2000; Makhija & Stewart, 2002), we took several steps to maximize our study’s response rate.”
Offshoring innovation to emerging markets: Organizational control and informal institutional distance (2014, background): “More pronounced differences in the informal institutions that prevail within the home and host country markets will garner heightened uncertainty for the foreigninvesting MNE (Makhija & Stewart, 2002).”
Internationalising in small, incremental or larger steps? (2007, background): “…institutions such as UNCTAD, the International Monetary Fund and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and by researchers, including the authors of papers in JIBS (Meyer, 2001; Meyer and Estrin, 2001; Makhija and Stewart, 2002; Uhlenbruck, 2004; Meyer and Peng, 2005; Wooster, 2006).”
Institutions, size and age in transition economies: Implications for export growth (2010, background): “…in Central and Eastern Europe that used a central planning regime through 1990 but since then have been moving towards a market-based economy with weakened bureaucratic control and the introduction of widespread private ownership (Makhija & Stewart, 2002; Peng & Heath, 1996; Svejnar, 2002).”
Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions (2005, background): “Similarly, Makhija and Stewart (2002) document a lower level of willingness to take risk among Czech managers, relative to US peers.”
Guest Editors' Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom* (2005, unknown): “…the importance of network linkages (Spicer et al., 2000), the necessity of environmental scanning (May et al., 2000), the importance of risk taking (Makhija and Stewart, 2002), the crucial interaction between institutional transitions and adaptive capabilities (White and Linden, 2002), and the…”
Multinational Firm Knowledge, use of Expatriates and Foreign Subsidiary Performance (2010, unknown): “Expatriates are not seen as being the best choice to manage the adaptation process due to their lack of knowledge about the host country’s political, economic, and cultural institutions and practices (Brock et al., 2008; Makhija and Stewart, 2002).”