The effects of developmental mentoring and high school mentors' attendance on their younger mentees' self‐esteem, social skills, and connectedness
By Michael J. Karcher. 2005
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95232ce722947190119b6e54fb9706fc6ee1223e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Safety Research
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- SEARCH: A Meta-Framework and Review of the Field of Positive Education (2019, background): “The selected strengths-based interventions were geographically diverse, being undertaken in the US (k = 2), Portugal (k = 1), Australia (k = 1), Israel (k = 1), New Zealand (k = 1) and the UK (k = 1), with student ages ranging from 10 to 15, total sample sizes from N = 38 to 2650, with all the inter”
- Mentoring Programs: A Framework to Inform Program Development, Research, and Evaluation. (2006, background): “Peer mentoring has come to be viewed both as an intervention for promoting civic and psychosocial development among adolescent mentors and as a Journal of Community Psychology DOI: 10.1002/jcop way to reach out to underachieving, isolated, or troubled children (Karcher, 2005a).”
- How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence (2011, background): “Available evidence points to added benefits when youth experience longer-term relationships with mentors (DuBois & Rhodes, 2006; Grossman, Chan, Schwartz, & Rhodes, 2011; Grossman & Rhodes, 2002; Herrera et al., 2007; Karcher, 2005; Slicker & Palmer, 1993).”
- School Crime Control and Prevention (2010, result): “Consistent with results from smaller-scale randomized trials of SBM showing positive effects on increasing connectedness to school (Karcher 2005) and perceived social support (Karcher 2008), Herrera et al. found that mentored youths reported more often than controls the presence of a nonparental…”
- Impact Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program. Final Report. NCEE 2009-4047. (2009, result): “In addition, correlational analyses from earlier studies have found associations between negative student outcomes and early termination of matches or inconsistent attendance on the part of mentors (Slicker and Palmer, 1993; Karcher, 2005; Portwood and Ayers, 2005).”
- The Role of Risk: Mentoring Experiences and Outcomes for Youth with Varying Risk Profiles. Executive Summary. (2013, background): “As more consistent and frequent mentor-youth contact has been linked to greater youth benefits (DuBois et al. 2002; Karcher 2005), the differences between the two studies in these areas could at least partially explain the divergent findings.”
- First do no harm: Ethical principles for youth mentoring relationships (2009, unknown): “…on agencies and volunteers but are at odds with the types of practices that are needed to establish and sustain high-quality mentoring relationships (DuBois et al., 2002; DuBois & Karcher, 2005; Herrera et al., JEAN RHODES received her PhD in clinical/community psychology from DePaul University.”