Firms' technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: A longitudinal study

By Douglas J. Miller. 2004

336 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93cf0c7d4b3b505b3c8f543ca0b08a48b527f7d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Rajdeep Grewal
2. Charles Kang
3. Frank Germann
4. G. Schryen
5. Timothy M. Devinney
6. Pierre J. Richard
7. George S. Yip
8. G. Johnson

In Information Systems

1. Charles Kang
2. Rajdeep Grewal
3. Frank Germann
4. G. Schryen
5. Pierre J. Richard
6. Timothy M. Devinney
7. George S. Yip
8. G. Johnson

In Strategy and Management

1. Timothy M. Devinney
2. George S. Yip
3. Pierre J. Richard
4. G. Johnson
5. Charles Kang
6. Frank Germann
7. Rajdeep Grewal
8. G. Schryen

Citations in the corpus

• SMEs' Radical Product Innovation: The Role of Internally and Externally Oriented Knowledge Capabilities** (2014, background): “Broader knowledge bases within the firm equal more diverse components of knowledge (including the employees’ mental models) that can be recombined and integrated in new ways (Kang, Morris, and Snell 2007; Miller 2004).”
• The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms (2007, background): “Therefore, the vertical and horizontal scope of a firm depends not only on the characteristics of the current transactions between parties, but also on the ongoing potential for cross-fertilization of knowledge to promote innovation (Chang, 1996; Miller, 2004).”
• Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice (2009, methodology): “The second approach is where the researcher uses several different measures to compare analyses with different dependent but identical independent variables (e.g., Baum & Wally, 2003; Contractor, Kundu, & Hsu, 2003; Miller, 2004; Peng, 2004).”
• Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, background): “…in other areas, such as in the strategy literature (Amihud & Lev, 1981; Christensen & Montgomery, 1981; Rumelt, 1982; Palepu, 1985; Robins & Wiersema, 1995; Farjoun, 1998; Miller, 2004; Tanriverdi & Venkatraman, 2005), there is hardly any mention of synergies of IS investments in the IS literature.”
• The Resource‐Based View in Entrepreneurship: A Content‐Analytical Comparison of Researchers' and Entrepreneurs' Views (2016, background): “We thus excluded a number of articles examining specific types of resources without discussing the general concept, such as articles focusing exclusively on human or managerial resources (e.g., Castanias and Helfat 1991) or specific technological resources (e.g., Miller 2004).”
• Washing Away Your Sins? Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Firm Performance (2016, methodology): “We selected Tobin’s q as our firm performance measure because it is market based and reflects the investors’ long-term expectation of the firm’s future earnings (Miller 2004).”