General Risk and Need, Gender Specificity, and the Recidivism of Female Offenders

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review (2015, unknown): “The LSI and its variants (LSI-R/LSI-OR/LS/CMI) obtained the highest AUC estimates for predicting recidivism.”
The Relationship Between Matching Service to Criminogenic Need and Recidivism in Male and Female Youth (2012, background): “In contrast, Rettinger and Andrews (2010) reported that the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2004) predicted recidivism strongly for both general and violent reoffending in a sample of 400 women but posited that genderspecific factors—such as histories of…”
Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, methodology): “The level of detailed inquiry that is necessary for such an investigation of LS is pursued elsewhere (Andrews et al., in press; Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Rettinger & Andrews, 2010).”
A Meta-Analytic Review of Correctional Interventions for Women Offenders (2016, background): “…as parenting stress, a history of trauma, adverse social conditions, and mental health problems, can also affect response to treatment and correctional outcomes (Blanchette & Brown, 2006; Brennan, Breitenbach, Dieterich, Salisbury, & Van Voorhis, 2012; Rettinger & Andrews, 2010; Van Voorhis, 2012).”