Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views

By Steven P. Tipper. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 2001

670 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93b873d61ab2c61f2fd7119d1b9046fea1284e89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. (2004, background): “Despite its popularity as a measure of inhibition, however, there is considerable debate regarding whether this effect actually reflects active suppression (see Fox, 1995; May, Kane, & Hasher, 1995; Neill, Valdes, & Terry, 1995; and Tipper, 2001, for reviews).”
Content and process priming: A review ☆ (2014, neutral): “Fifth, we will not review negative priming effects (Tipper, 2001).”
Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism (2011, background): “As for L1 attrition, Tsimpli et al. (2004) tested syntactic properties of null subject languages such as the grammaticality of subject extractions out of Wh-islands (Chi si chiede Maria se ha invitato Paolo? “Who does Maria wonder whether has invited Paolo?”), in addition to pronominal subjects, and”
In Opposition to Inhibition (2003, methodology): “Negative priming lay dormant for a decade until it was revived by Neill (1977), Lowe (1979), and Tipper (1985), and has since become one of the most familiar cognitive tasks (for reviews, see Fox, 1995; May, Kane, & Hasher, 1995; Tipper, 2001).”
Emotion Regulation in Depression: Relation to Cognitive Inhibition (2010, positive): “Finally, we should point out that the concept of inhibition has been criticised in research on attention and memory (e.g., Friedman & Miyake, 2004; MacLeod, Dodd, Sheard, Wilson, & Bibi, 2003; but see Anderson, 2003; Tipper, 2001).”
On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven (2006, background): “, 2004) or complete previous attentional settings, which then can speed up selection of matching targets (Hillstrom, 2000; Tipper, 2001).”
PERSISTENCE OF THE INTUITIVE CONCEPTION THAT HEAVIER OBJECTS SINK MORE: A REACTION TIME STUDY WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INTERFERENCE (2015, background): “Even though some alternative causal explanations for such latencies—sometimes based on memory retrieval—have been proposed (Egner & Hirsch, 2005), most of the authors attribute the phenomenon to the presence of the function of inhibition (Borst, Poirel, Pineau&Cassoti, 2012; Tipper, 2001).”
Lexical Access in Bilingual Speech Production: Evidence from Language Switching in Highly Proficient Bilinguals and L2 Learners. (2004, background): “Therefore, the more inhibition applied to a given lexicon, the harder it will be to overcome such suppression on a subsequent trial (see Tipper, 2001; for discussion of negative priming).”
Negative Priming as a Memory Phenomenon (2007, methodology): “The distractor inhibition model (Tipper, 1985) has been modified since its first version (Houghton & Tipper, 1994; Tipper, 2001; Tipper & Cranston, 1985).”
Theoretical issues in inhibition: Insights from research on human memory. (2007, background): “Very similar arguments can be made about the negative priming phenomenon (see Neill & Valdes, 1996; Milliken et al, 1998; Tipper 2001 for reviews) in selective attention.”
The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control (2007, neutral): “Tipper SP. 2001.”