The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control

By Adam R. Aron. The Neuroscientist, 2007

1,080 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73b1515ad22ec216a3d7cd1b701a13f87d694bfe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Michael J Frank
2. Adam R. Aron
3. Frederick Verbruggen
4. Trevor W. Robbins
5. Gordon D. Logan
6. Russell A. Poldrack
7. Naomi P. Friedman
8. Timothy Edward John Behrens

In Sensory Systems

1. Jean Daunizeau
2. Marie Devaine
3. Guillaume Hollard
4. Gal Sheppes
5. Michael J Frank
6. Trevor W. Robbins
7. Russell A. Poldrack
8. Steve M. Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI (2007, methodology): “A second experiment tested this idea with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a conditional stop-signal paradigm, enabling examination of behavioral and neural signatures of conflict-induced slowing.”
• Self-paced movements induce high-frequency gamma oscillations in primary motor cortex (2008, background): “There has been increasing interest in the role of such networks in the voluntary control of motor responses and response inhibition (Aron, 2007; van den Wildenberg et al., 2006) and non-invasive studies of motor cortex gamma activity using MEG may provide further insight into such mechanisms.”
• Transcending the “good & bad” and “here & now” in emotion regulation: Costs and benefits of strategies across regulatory stages (2020, background): “Activity in the right DLPFC has been traditionally associated with general effortful control (e.g., Vanderhasselt et al., 2007; Vanderhasselt, De Raedt, Baeken, Leyman, & D’haenen, 2006) and cognitive inhibition (Aron, 2007).”
• Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. (2008, background): “Within neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience, impulsivity is often equated with the term ‘disinhibition’, referring to the idea that top-down control mechanisms ordinarily suppress automatic or reward-driven responses that are not appropriate to the current demands (Aron, 2007).”
• The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2021, background): “That is, one could describe most if not all CC processes as requiring some sort of inhibition [159].”
• Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion (2012, neutral): “As noted earlier, decrease goals may require more cognitive resources than increase goals, including placing greater demands on selection/inhibitory functions associated with right vlPFC 108-110 .”
• Progress in Executive-Function Research (2008, background): “seems that one constituent process could relate to the control of irrelevant response tendencies, as patients with damage to the right IFC (who had impaired SSRT in the stop-signal paradigm) also had the longest switch costs (reviewed in Aron, 2007; also see Hodgson et al., 2007).”
• Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, background): “According to current knowledge on neural networks underlying motor inhibition (Aron, 2007, 2011), these indeed are the core centers of the cortex exerting control in this domain.”
• Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting (2013, background): “In a later paper (Anderson et al., 2004) they claimed to have identified the neural systems underlying Freudian repression (although such a conclusion depends on acceptance of the repression interpretation, see Aron, 2007).”
• The Social Bayesian Brain: Does Mentalizing Make a Difference When We Learn? (2014, methodology): “Second, inhibitory control was measured as the sensitivity index d9 in a Go/No Go task [26].”
• Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, neutral): “But how can we reconcile evidence indicating that either IFG (Aron et al., 2003b; Chambers et al., 2006, 2007) or SMA/preSMA (Floden and Stuss, 2006; Picton et al., 2007) are selectively crucial for response inhibition?”
• Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms (2008, background): “Response inhibition is considered to be a key component of executive control (e.g., Andres, 2003; Aron, 2007; Logan, 1985a; Miyake et al., 2000; Stuphorn and Schall, 2006).”