In Opposition to Inhibition

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes. (2005, background): “The main problem is that one cannot derive the concept of inhibition directly from the concept of inhibition at the neural level (MacLeod et al. 2003).”
Progress in Executive-Function Research (2008, background): “This bears on the important question of whether ‘‘inhibition’’ is a valid concept in psychological research (see Aron, 2007; MacLeod, Dodd, Sheard, Wilson, & Bibi, 2003 ).”
Executive Functions (2012, neutral): “Not everyone agrees that these tasks require inhibitory control [see, for example, MacLeod et al. (2003) on the Stroop task and Roberts & Pennington (1996) on the antisaccade task].”
Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, background): “Resolution may proceed via the facilitation of appropriate information, inhibition of inappropriate information, a combination of the two, or some other strategy, such as switching response sets (Hasher, Zacks, & May, 1999; MacLeod, Dodd, Sheard, Wilson, & Bibi, 2003 ).”
Emotion Regulation in Depression: Relation to Cognitive Inhibition (2010, neutral): “Finally, we should point out that the concept of inhibition has been criticised in research on attention and memory (eg, Friedman & Miyake, 2004 ; MacLeod, Dodd, Sheard, Wilson, & Bibi, 2003 ; but see Anderson, 2003 ; Tipper, 2001 ).”