Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue

By Raghu Garud, Cynthia Hardy, S. Maguire. 2007

1,224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93322c16b4b2bab3d343f898f348d330e7ef40cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy: China's Shan-Zhai Mobile Phones (2014, result): “…many respects, our analysis of how Chinese shanzhai entrepreneurs pursued transition and changed state policy is very consistent with other work on institutional entrepreneurship concerned with the process of how actors change institutions (Garud, Hardy, and Maguire, 2007; Hardy and Maguire, 2008).”
Uncertainty, Knowledge Problems, and Entrepreneurial Action (2018, background): “For these reasons, perhaps entrepreneurs use multiple logics over timewhile engaging in entrepreneurial action? A related stream of research, concerning the processes of social negotiation, explores the ways in which entrepreneurs rely on key levers of social influence, such as empathic accuracy (Mc”
The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector (2016, background): “Scholars have increasingly drawn on concepts from institutional theory in order to describe the norms and rules that stabilize a socio-technical system (Geels, 2004). Using the three institutional pillars by Scott (2001), the regime has been described as the highly institutionalized regulative, norm”
Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies (2011, methodology): “Taking institutional entrepreneurship as an approach we can explain better changes in innovation policies and other development efforts (Garud et al, 2007).”
Agency and Institutions: A Review on Institutional Entrepreneurship (2009, result): “It is interesting to contrast it with recent critical appraisals of research on institutional entrepreneurship (e.g., Cooper, Willmott, and Ezzamel, forthcoming, 2008; Garud, Hardy, and Maguire, 2007; Hardy and Maguire, forthcoming 2008).”
WHEN INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE OUTRUNS THE CHANGE AGENT: THE CONTESTED TERRAIN OF ENTREPRENEURIAL MICROFINANCE FOR THOSE IN POVERTY (SUMMARY) (2012, background): “It emphasizes not only the embeddedness of organizational fields but also how change agents (institutional entrepreneurs) bring innovation to the institutional environment (Battilana, 2006; DiMaggio, 1988; Garud et al., 2007; Maguire, 2007).”
Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know? (2016, positive): “As the comprehensive survey in Hall and Lawson (2014) showed, almost all papers showed positive effects on growth, productivity, employment, and other macroeconomic variables of economic freedom. However, only four of the 402 studies surveyed by Hall and Lawson (2014) directly explored any relations”
The Liabilities of Origin: An Emerging Economy Perspective on the Costs of Doing Business Abroad (2010, neutral): “” Central to the scholarship on institutional entrepreneurship is the role of intentionality, interest and agency in altering institutional arrangements (Garud et al., 2007). Scholars have begun appreciating the theoretical benefits of using an institutional entrepreneurial perspective in theories o”
Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability (2011, background): “Rather actors have the possibility to influence, shape, and modify institutional settings and logics along their interests through institutional work (Lawrence and Suddaby 2006) and institutional entrepreneurship ( Garud et al. 2007; Maguire et al. 2004).”