A New Test to Measure Emotion Recognition Ability: Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART)

By Dawn A. Matsumoto, J. Leroux, Carinda Wilson-Cohn, Jake Raroque, Kristie Kooken, Paul Ekman, Nathan Yrizarry, Sherry Loewinger, H. Uchida, Albert Yee and 2 more. 2000

367 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92c7796d4779a98316999a6aec5b4bbd73728749

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. (2010, background): “Ekman and colleagues' research has shown there are considerable individual differences in the ability to perceive emotion (Ekman & O'Sullivan, 1991; Matsumoto et al., 2000).”
Assessing Emotional Intelligence (2009, methodology): “2007), plus facial emotion recognition (Matsumoto et al., 2000) and vocal”
Emotional intelligence: A promise unfulfilled? (2012, critical): “More troubling are failures of MSCEIT scores to converge with objective tests of emotion processing, such as Matsumoto et al. (2000) the JACBART test and other performance tasks (Farrelly & Austin, 2007; Roberts et al., 2006).”
Mind-reading ability: Beliefs and performance☆ (2003, background): “Matsumoto with colleagues found, for example, that, in general, individuals who score high on Openness, Conscientiousness and Extraversion, and low on Neuroticism are more successful in recognizing emotional expressions (Matsumoto et al., 2000).”
A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions (2007, background): “The most diYcult personality factors to judge are neuroticism and openness to experience (Borkenau & Liebler, 1993; Funder & Dobroth, 1987), presumably because there are few or conXicting behavioral cues (Funder & Sneed, 1993).”
Assessing the Ability to Recognize Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion: Construction and Validation of the Emotion Recognition Index (2011, background): “The lack of psychometrically sound and construct-validated test instruments capable of diagnosing individual differences in the central emotion perception ability component of EI (see Joseph and Newman 2010 ) is all the more surprising because emotion psychologists have extensively studied the capa”
Detecting Deception from Emotional and Unemotional Cues (2009, methodology): “Although there have been no validity studies of the METT, it was developed from expressions used in the Brief Affect Recognition Test (BART) which has been shown to have good reliability and validity (Matsumoto et al. 2000).”
Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance: The Importance of Emotion Regulation and Emotional Labor Context (2010, background): “For instance, Conscientious behavior requires the perception of social norms, which can be obtained from the accurate reading of others’ emotional cues (Matsumoto et al., 2000).”
The influence of emotion recognition and emotion regulation on intercultural adjustment (2006, positive): “Previous studies using JACBART have shown it to have generally high internal and temporal reliability and concurrent and convergent validity (Matsumoto et al., 2000).”
Emotional Intelligence as an Ability: Theory, Challenges, and New Directions (2018, methodology): “Among the most frequently used of these tests are the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy (DANVA; Nowicki & Duke 1994), the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS; Rosenthal, Hall, DiMatteo, Rogers, & Archer,1979), and the Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART; Matsumot”
Are Cultural Differences in Emotion Regulation Mediated by Personality Traits? (2006, background): “For example, agreeableness may be related to how individuals express negative emotions (McCrae & Costa, 1997); agreeableness and conscientiousness has been correlated with positive emotions (Costa & McCrae, 1980; McCrae & Costa, 1991); and openness has been correlated with the ability to recognize e”
A Spontaneous Micro-expression Database: Inducement, collection and baseline (2013, methodology): “For the SMIC database we use 1/2 second as the cut line [30], [31].”
Emotional Intelligence: Toward a Consensus of Models and Measures (2010, methodology): “Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART; Matsumoto et al., 2000) An instrument consisting of 56 stimuli, presented in video format.”
The Validity of the MSCEIT: Additional Analyses and Evidence (2012, methodology): “The MSCEIT was least correlated with three measures of emotional perception: vocal 1 (vocal tone; Roberts et al., 2006 ), the Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART; Matsumoto et al., 2000), and " facial blends " (Austin, 2010).”
Context is Everything (in Emotion Research) (2018, background): “However, Matsumoto et al. (2000) directly examined the role of extraversion and neuroticism in emotion recognition across four studies and found superior recognition among extraverts in only one study.”
Human abilities: emotional intelligence. (2008, methodology): “…used measures of perceptual accuracy in emotion are the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scales (DANVA and DANVA-2; Nowicki & Duke 1994) and the Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test ( JACBART; Matsumoto et al. 2000), though there are others (e.g., Elfenbein et al. 2006).”