Identifying Technology Transfer in Foreign Direct Investment: Influence of Industry Conditions and Investing Firm Motives
By Wilbur Chung. 2001
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91fdf0d3abcacb9dea6ef01220da54006020a133
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ram Mudambi
- H. P. Bowen
- Arun Kumaraswamy
- Lorraine Eden
- Byungchae Jin
- F. García
- Robert Salomon
- S. Tamer Cavusgil
Citations in the corpus
- Technology spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): the active role of MNC subsidiaries in Argentina in the 1990s (2006, background): “For example, In Sweden (Braconier et al., 2001) or the USA (Chung, 2001), as well as in transition or industrialising economies such as Morocco (Haddad and Harrison, 1993), the Czech Republic (Djankov and Hoekman, 2000), Venezuela (Aitken and Harrison, 1999) or Poland, Bulgaria and Romania (Konings,”
- Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification (2008, background): “Similarly, increased foreign presence in an industry has been found to increase productivity and efficiency (Chung, 2001b) and to increase the comparative advantage of the domestic industry (Driffield and Munday, 2000).”
- Does inward foreign direct investment improve the innovative performance of local firms (2013, background): “Enhanced competition inhibits local firms from gaining monopolistic or oligopolistic profits, which induces local firms to take action to defend their markets and retain market share (Chung, 2001).”
- New Competition; Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development in China (2004, background): “In prior research on FDI spillovers in literature, the determinants of productivity are usually the central concern and spillovers are generally measured as the impact of the presence of foreign firms on the productivity of domestic firms (e.g. Caves, 1974; Globerman, 1979; Blomström and Persson, 19”
- Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy (2005, background): “…1971), creates greater pressure on domestic firms to increase efficiency to remain competitive than would a new domestic player (Caves, 1996; Chung, 2001a, 2001b; 2 During the time period studied here, 1985–94, the rise in global transactions and hence also in foreign competition occurred…”
- International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century: From the obsolescing bargain to the political bargaining model (2005, background): “Chung (2001), for example, showed that the technology spillover benefits to the United States were reduced when FDI entrants came from countries with average technology levels below US levels.”
- Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization (2012, background): “Alternatively, it may occur through unintentional spillovers due to labor mobility, leakage of intellectual property and imitation by domestic firms, or vertical linkages (Alcacer & Chung, 2007; Blomström & Kokko, 1998; Cantwell, 1989; Chung, 2001).”
- The influence of market and cultural environmental factors on technology transfer between foreign MNCs and local subsidiaries: A Croatian illustration (2006, background): “In the expansion of MNCs, technology transfer to local subsidiaries is essential for successful operation of the subsidiaries in the local market (e.g., Chen, 1996; Chung, 2001; Ofer & Polterovich, 2000).”