Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: The Hofstede VSM 94 example
By W. O. Bearden, R. B. Money, Jennifer L. Nevins. 2006
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/915650e8bb308ed639aeda131abfc9ad1eee158f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Do Chinese cultural values affect customer satisfaction/loyalty? (2008, background): “However, others contend that viewing and measuring culture from an individual psychological perspective is appropriate and valid in predicting behaviour (Earley, 1997; Bearden et al., 2006).”
- Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation (2010, background): “However, this paper points out that the term ‘prudence’ may better represent Bearden et al.’s (2006b) ‘planning’ factor because it represents a”
- Personality-and-culture: The case of national extraversion and word-of-mouth (2006, background): “In fact, the structure of Hofstede's values and the validity of the associated measures have been shown to be different at different levels of analysis (Bearden et al., 2006).”
- Measuring Hofstede's Five Dimensions of Cultural Values at the Individual Level: Development and Validation of CVSCALE (2011, unknown): “The LTO is an eight-item, two-subscale measure of long-term orientation (Bearden et al. 2006).”