Fair trade coffee: building producer capacity via global networks

By Laura T. Raynolds, D. Murray, P. L. Taylor. 2004

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/913dc76fe7ba1a464827d11effef9edd7fd8447a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Plant Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Fair Trade Certification for Coffee Farmers in Peru (2012, background): “In addition to income and consumption effects related to the FT impact on poverty reduction, attention is given to other implications for skills and knowledge (Imhof & Lee, 2007), input use and quality management (Balineau, 2008; Ruben & Zuniga, 2011; Renard, 2005), environmental effects (Neilson & ”
Profits and poverty: Certification's troubled link for Nicaragua's organic and fairtrade coffee producers (2011, methodology): “We apply the estimation methods for opportunity costs of Reisch and Zeddies (1977) and Kay et al.”
Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry (2005, background): “…clear that to date none of these explicitly 7 Among others, see Damiani (2001, 2002), Hopkins (2000), Jørgensen and Muller (2003), Raynolds (2002), Raynolds et al. (2004), Rice and McLean (1999), Mace (1998), Murray et al. (2003), Schmidt (2002), Tallontire (1999, 2000), Taylor (2005) and…”
Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda (2015, background): “Generally, mean Fairtrade prices are reported to be higher than free market prices (Raynolds et al., 2004; Bacon, 2005; Arnould et al., 2009; Ruben & Zuniga, 2011), although de Janvry et al. (2010) found that effective price advantages are minimal for some farmers due to overcertification.”
The future of Fair Trade coffee: dilemmas facing Latin America's small-scale producers (2006, background): “Mexico has been the dominant player in this production, with Colombia, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Peru also making significant contributions to the overall volume (Raynolds et al. 2004).”
Impacts of Fair Trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua (2010, background): “Earlier research has suggested that Fair Trade improves the producers’ resilience to adverse shocks, reduces livelihood vulnerability, and improves organizational skills of small coffee producers, laborers, and their associations (Bacon 2005; MacDonald 2007; Murray et al. 2006; Raynolds et al. 2004”
The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption (2009, background): “and its sale is growing at the fastest rate (Raynolds et al., 2004).”
Reviewing the impacts of coffee certification programmes on smallholder livelihoods (2017, background): “Several studies use the phrase ‘capacity building’ to describe the institutional support available to farmers from schemes (e.g. Raynolds et al. 2004; UttingChamorro 2005; Utting 2009; Mendez et al. 2010; Valkila & Nygren 2010).”
Keeping trade fair: governance challenges in the fair trade coffee initiative (2005, background): “Fair trade’s most important indirect benefits include the strengthening of farmers’ organizational capacity (also see Raynolds et al., 2004).”
National Contexts Matter: The Co-Evolution of Sustainability Standards in Global Value Chains (2012, background): “…from: AC (2007), 4C (2009), Daviron & Ponte (2005), Giovannucci (2001), Giovannucci & Potts (2008), Giovannucci et al., (2008), Lazaro (2008), Potts (2007), Rainforest Alliance (2008), Raynolds et al. (2004), Starbucks (2007), TCARC (2009), USAID & Rainforest Alliance (2007), UTZ Certified (2008)”