Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales

By M. Reitzig. 2004

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/910bd17b9fa045320126047825e39e72978155a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Filing strategies and patent value (2011, neutral): “…as is the case for non-patent references (in line with Carpenter, Cooper, and Narin 1980; Narin, Noma, and Perry 1987), but in contradiction with Reitzig (2004b), who obtained a negative coefficient, and Allison and Lemley (1998), Harhoff and Hall (2002), Harhoff, Scherer, and Vopel (2002),…”
Knowledge Maturity and the Scientific Value of Innovations (2017, background): “…claims (ß = 0.01, p .001) (Lanjouw & Schankerman, 2004), the support of the U.S. government (ß = 0.48, p .001), the age of the patent (ß = 0.15, p .001) (Reitzig, 2004), the scientific knowledge referred to by the patent (ß = 0.001, p .001) (Fleming & Sorenson, 2004), and the firm’s…”
Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value (2006, background): “We believe that future research on alternate measures of innovation and even additional patent statistics (see for example Reitzig 2004) will yield new insights on the relationships between rival innovation and a firm’s financial-market value.”
Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners (2014, background): “Similarly, we ntroduce the number of backward patent references to control or unobserved factors affecting citation behavior (Reitzig, 2004). inally, we include the number of inventors listed on the patent s an additional control because more inventors may lead to faster nd greater diffusion of the…”
Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances (2014, positive): “Indeed, previous studies have shown that a higher number of claims indicates that an innovation is of greater potential profitability (e.g., Lanjouw and Schankerman, 2004; Reitzig, 2004), and hence of greater perceived importance.”
The effect of institutional ownership on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms (2017, positive): “As forward citations provide a reliable approximation of patent quality (Gambardella et al., 2008; Reitzig, 2004), we generate our second measure of innovation output, citation counts (i.e., citation-weighted patent counts).”