Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study

By Sarv Devaraj, Rajiv Kohli. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2000

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/903b212e415795b188c22758b7fddefda9924036

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry (2004, background): “Meanwhile, successful launching of online functionality and back-end integration relies on necessary organizational reconfiguration and business processes reengineering [18].”
Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research (2003, methodology): “…2000a) Duration: Number of Years (Brynjolfsson 1993, Mahmood and Szewczak 1999) Data Source Firm, Commercial Databases (Brvnjoltsson and Yang 1996, Devaraj and Kohli 2000a) Variables Employed Dependent Classification (Robey and Boudreau 1999} Data Analysis Statistical Analysis (Lee and Barua…”
Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view (2007, background): “Although the impact of process innovation on ﬁrm success is mixed, research shows that increasing the investment in IT increases the impact of process innovation on ﬁrm performance (Devaraj and Kohli, 2000).”
Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya (2019, background): “In the contemporary business environment, technology has a ﬀ ected and been integrated by almost all small and large organizations (Devaraj & Kohli, 2000).”
In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions (2003, background): “Three of these 15 illustrate best practices by employing ratio scales (Ahituv et al. 1998; Banker and Slaughter 2000; Devaraj and Kohli 2000).”
A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis (2010, background): “, 1997; Alpar and Kim, 1990; Shin, 2006), ROS (Bharadwaj, 2000; Tam, 1998; Mahmood and Mann, 1993; Tanriverdi, 2006), revenue (Francalanci and Galal, 1998; Devaraj and Kohli, 2000; Rai et al., 2006), and sale (Weill, 1992; Mahmood and Mann, 1993; Rai et al.”
Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? (2003, background): “In recent years, a surge in the number of studies that examine the IT payoff is a testimony to this challenge (Mukhopadhyay et al. 1995, Brynjolfsson 1996, Dewan and Min 1997, Francalanci and Galal 1998, Bharadwaj et al. 1999, Devaraj and Kohli 2000, Sohal Moss and Ng 2001).”
Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, methodology): “…capacity utilisation and product quality (Barua et al , 1995; Thatcher & Oliver, 2001; Thatcher & Pingry, 2004b, 2007), customer satisfaction (Devaraj & Kohli, 2000), production efficiency (Thatcher & Oliver, 2001) and productive efficiency (Chen & Lin, 2009; Lin, 2009), consumer welfare…”
Do business process reengineering projects payoff? Evidence from the United States (2010, background): “Devaraj and Kohli [26] show that investments in IT can contribute to a higher level of revenue if they are supported by BPR initiatives.”
Service-oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade (2008, background): “In addition, the process view recognizes that not all benefits will accrue immediately (Devaraj and Kohli, 2000); instead there will be lags of unknown duration from the time of investment to the time at which value begins to flow (Tallon et al., 2000).”