The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity

By Michael Marmot. 2004

1,159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d404fa4521012da2533767c34bc6b1eb1d7ebe8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Serving the Self From the Seat of Power (2014, background): “…contexts, employees at higher organizational levels are happier, healthier, less stressed, and more satisfied with their jobs (Brown, Gardner, Oswald, & Qian, 2008; Marmot, 2004; Oshagbemi, 1997; Robie, Ryan, Schmeider, Parra, & Smith, 1998; Sherman et al., 2012), compared to those at lower levels.”
Socioeconomic Status, Income Inequality, and Health Complaints: A Basic Psychological Needs Perspective (2014, background): “Social gradients and regional differences in population health are now salient concerns in epidemiology and public health research (Marmot 2004; Wilkinson and Pickett 2009).”
The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. (2017, background): “In part, that is because social esteem is closely-coupled to self-esteem, a feature of personality consequential for physical health and mental well-being (Marmot 2004; Fisk 2010).”
Evolution and ontogeny of stress response to social challenges in the human child (2006, background): “Resolution of this paradox may have signiWcant consequences for public health (Dressler & Bindon, 2000; Dressler, Oths, & Gravely, 2005; Flinn & England, 2003; Marmot, 2004), because it could provide new insights into associations among stress response, social disparities, and perinatal programming,”
ASSESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL WELL‐BEING: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE I COPPE SCALE (2015, background): “In general, favorable economic conditions have been associated with better mental and physical health (Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008; Donohoe, 2013; Levy & Sidel, 2006; Marmot, 2004; Prilleltensky, 2012; Sen, 2009) and life satisfaction overall (Diener, Kahneman, Tov, & Arora, 20”
Australian Dietary Guidelines (2006, background): “Employment, income, education, cultural influences, lifestyle, language, sex and other genetic differences, geographic, social or cultural isolation, age and disability, the security and standard of accommodation, and the availability of facilities and services, all influence diet, health and nutrit”
Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value (2012, background): “Related, the level of autonomy individuals experience in their job (Marmot, 2004) is known to fuel individuals' sense of power.”
Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: Shifting the narrative (2017, background): “Perceptions of social status can independently impact health (Marmot, 2004).”
Social capital and health in European welfare regimes: a multilevel approach (2007, background): “The psycho-social explanation suggests that socioeconomic differences affect health through perceptions of place in the social hierarchy (Wilkinson, 1996; Marmot, 2004).”
Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors (2010, background): “Rather, disadvantageous social comparisons among nearly all SES groups with those at higher levels weaken social cohesion across society in ways that motivate unhealthy behaviors to deal with the stress (Marmot 2004).”
The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy (2010, background): “Income disparity is obviously a form of hierarchy (Keltner et al., 2003; Marmot, 2004; Ng, 1980; Weber, 1947) and pay differences are often a sign of asymmetries in status and power as well (Bloom & Michel, 2002; Davis & Moore, 1945; Desai, Brief, & George, 2010; Frank, 1985).”
The personal sense of power. (2012, background): “On this generalized level, socioeconomic status likely shapes the personal sense of power, as individuals higher in socioeconomic status have more money, better access to educational and professional resources, and thus greater control and choice in general (Adler et al., 1994; Domhoff, 2002; Marmot”