Making sense of higher education: students as consumers and the value of the university experience

By T. Woodall, A. Hiller, S. Resnick. 2014

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b4d0341cc4e7f93158bc507fc59f0911dd2d87d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. P. Carey

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Carey
2. Neil Selwyn

Citations in the corpus

• Building bridges in higher education: Student-faculty relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty (2020, background): “HEIs may be better able to influence positive academic involvement if they understand the mechanisms through which student–faculty relationship quality affects student engagement and, in turn, student loyalty (Taylor & Parsons, 2011).”
• What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning (2017, background): “…digital technology relates to the ongoing ‘ effort ’ involved in being a student – that is, the ongoing demands of revision, examinations, coursework; the continual travel between classes/buildings; and the loss of home comfort and having to fend for oneself (Woodall, Hiller, and Resnick 2014).”
• Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: a case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design (2013, background): “This is coherent with Woodall’s assertion (Woodall et al., 2012) that students are consumers, but they are not only consumers.”