How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions
By Ronnel B. King, D. McInerney, D. Watkins. 2012
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a71d1fcec26a46fde5ca3bbe9c0b22d0d520ce8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Kou Murayama
- Thomas Goetz
- A. Elliot
- Ronnel B. King
- Fabio Sticca
- Nathan C. Hall
- Marianne Jennifer M. Gaerlan
In Social Psychology
- Kou Murayama
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Thomas Goetz
- A. Elliot
- Ronnel B. King
- Fabio Sticca
- Nathan C. Hall
- Marianne Jennifer M. Gaerlan
Citations in the corpus
- High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school (2014, background): “In contrast, more negative environments wherein teachers are overly demanding and controlling or where classroom management is poor will lead to negative emotions (Frenzel et al. 2009; King et al. 2012; Stipek et al. 1995; Valeski and Stipek 2001).”
- Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach (2016, background): “For example, Daniels et al. (2008, 2009) found that mastery goals were negatively related to boredom and anger, King et al. (2012) found performance-approach goals to be positively related to hope and pride, and Pekrun et al. (2006, 2009) reported positive relations of performance-avoidance goals…”
- Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study (2015, background): “However, studies in the collectivist settings have shown that trying to please one’s parents was associated with higher levels of academic motivation and engagement (Bernardo, 2008b; King et al., 2012).”