Cross‐national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education
By A. Langen, H. Dekkers. 2005
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a4fd59e1480270938609e5e643773c844fda58c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- K. Pyhältö
- Adam V. Maltese
- Auli Toom
- Robert H. Tai
- Jenni Stubb
- Tanja van der Lippe
- Parvati Raghuram
- K. Bradley
In Political Science and International Relations
In Safety Research
- Adam V. Maltese
- Robert H. Tai
- Parvati Raghuram
- Andrea Keck Frei
- Christine Bieri Buschor
- Christa Kappler
- Simone Berweger
- Ineke Maas
Citations in the corpus
- Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students (2011, background): “Looking at differences in enrollment from an international perspective, Van Langen and Dekkers (2005) propose that the greater enrollment of women in STEM in some countries may be a result of a longer history of gender equality legislation in those nations.”
- Migrant women in male‐dominated sectors of the labour market: a research agenda (2008, background): “(12) See Blickenstaff (2005) and van Langen and Dekkers (2005) for critiques of how these are produced through the education system.”
- Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries1 (2009, background): “For example, we have tested and rejected arguments holding that the GDP effect is attributable to cross-national variability in the prestige of science, or that it reflects differential linkages to the global institutions that promote gender-egalitarian agendas.29 To account for the longer tradition”
- Challenges of Becoming a Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students' Problems and Well-Being (2012, result): “As in previous studies, lack of interest appeared to be an indicator for dropout risk [95, 96].”
- Boys’ and girls’ educational choices in secondary education. The role of gender ideology (2016, background): “Educational choices already differ in early adolescence, with boys being more likely to choose mathematics and science tracks and girls tending to choose non-science tracks (Charles and Bradley 2009; Pinxten et al. 2012; Van Langen, Rekers-Mombarg, and Dekkers 2006, 2008).”
- Majoring in STEM—What Accounts for Women's Career Decision Making? A Mixed Methods Study (2014, background): “The focus, therefore, has shifted to the question of why students with high abilities and interest in STEM do not choose STEM studies (Buccheri, Abt Gürber, & Brühwiler, 2011; Korpershoek, Kuyper, van der Werf, & Bosker, 2010; van Langen & Dekkers, 2005).”