Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying.

By Sheri Bauman, A. D. Rio. 2006

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Telling is compelling: the impact of student reports of bullying on teacher intervention (2010, background): “Research has explored a variety of factors that may influence when and how teacher responses occur, including teacher attitudes (Nicolaides, Toda, & Smith, 2002 ) and preparedness and/or level of teacher training (Bauman & Del Rio, 2006 ; Beran, 2006 ).”
Teachers' Attitudes Towards Overt and Covert Bullying, and Perceived Efficacy to Intervene (2011, background): “Past studies have revealed that not all teachers consider the non-physical covert forms of bullying to be serious and as a result, have not always intervened appropriately (Bauman & Del Rio, 2006; Boulton, 1997; Craig, et al., 2000; Jacobson & Bauman, 2007; Yoon & Kerber, 2003).”
Classroom Management, Bullying, and Teacher Practices. (2010, background): “In a very recent study, Bauman and Del Rio (2006) discovered that " preservice teachers considered relational bullying to be less serious than other forms of bullying " (p. 225).”
Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model. (2015, background): “Higher levels of bullying and victimization have been linked to inappropriate teacher responses (e.g., Bauman & Del Rio, 2006), poor teacher–student relationships (Bacchini et al., 2009; Doll et al., 2004; Richard et al., 2011), lack of teacher support, and lack of engagement in school activities…”