Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness

By Sang M. Lee, Suzanne J. Peterson. 2000

1,026 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5157ba09940b5002384611896d4d0bb87bb02af8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors (2013, positive): “…comprising innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking exhibited a high level of configural and measurement invariance and was stable across cultural contexts, suggesting that attributes of entrepreneurial behaviors are perceived in similar ways across cultures (see also Lee & Peterson, 2000).”
‘Znakomstva I Svyazi’ (Acquaintances and connections) – Blat, the Soviet Union, and mundane entrepreneurship (2004, background): “A similar argument can be found in Lee and Peterson (2000), where the ‘entrepreneurial orientation’ in former Soviet economies is found lacking simply because they do not function according to Western ideas of economic individualism.”
The European Venture Capital and Private Equity Country Attractiveness Indices (2009, neutral): “Manly (1994) discusses principal component analysis. Nardo et al. (2005a) propose factor analysis, and data development analysis.”
Entrepreneurship and culture (2010, background): “…several studies have explored the relationship between various aspects of culture and entrepreneurial behavior across cultures (McGrath and MacMillan 1992; Busenitz, Gómez and Spencer 2000; Lee and Peterson 2000; Mueller and Thomas 2000; Stephan and Uhlaner 2010; Autio, Pathak and Wennberg 2010).”
Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: a multi-country study (2011, background): “ Lee and Peterson (2000) also characterize EO as the entrepreneurial process which reveals how entrepreneurship is undertaken in terms of the methods, practices, and decision making processes for new entry into the market.”
Critical success factors for e-commerce entrepreneurship: an empirical study of Thailand (2009, background): “Lee and Peterson (2000) revealed that entrepreneurs are willing to accept the uncertainty and risks associated with being self-employed, as opposed to settling for the refuge of jobs within organizations.”
Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation (2001, background): “That said, Lee and Peterson (2000) effectively argue that there are cultural and institutional differences in the entrepreneurial orientation across countries.”
A cross cultural study of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (2013, background): “Other studies attribute national differences in entrepreneurial activities to variation in the prevalence of “potential entrepreneurs”—individuals with the propensity, motivation, and desire to start a business (Mueller and Thomas 2001; Lee and Peterson 2000; Beugelsdijk and Noorderhaven 2004; Del”
Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Indian SMEs: Universal and contingency perspectives (2016, background): “EO was originally conceived as a culturally universal concept across all cultures, but entrepreneurial tendencies may not be equally effective in emerging economies due to significant differences in the institutional context (Lee and Peterson, 2001).”
Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs (2011, background): “In addition, individualism has been linked to entrepreneurial orientation (Lee and Peterson, 2000; Mueller and Thomas, 2001) a critical determinant of the success of SMEs (Rauch et al., 2009).”