Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding

By L. Wheeldon, Willem J. M. Levelt. 1995

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology, Linguistics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

In Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming (2000, result): “This contrasts with the report by Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) of a syllable-match effect when Dutch participants monitored their own inner speech for syllable targets, which suggests the possible involvement of perceptual factors in this study.”
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. (2004, background): “…segment, as appears from LRP experiments (Van Turennout, Hagoort, & Brown, 1997) and phoneme self-monitoring experiments, in which reaction times increased at about this rate as a function of the word internal position of phonemes and interacted with syllable structure (Wheeldon & Levelt, 1995).”
Phonetic bias in sound change (2011, background): “We follow Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) and Browman and Goldstein (1990) in assuming that the speech production phonetic space is populated with smaller (segmental or syllabic) exemplars used in calculating speech motor plans.”
Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production (2000, result): “That is in agreement with earlier ® ndings by Wheeldon and Levelt (1995), where phonological encoding of a word was observed to proceed under concurrent articulation of another word.”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, background): “Based on experiments demonstrating that reaction times for phoneme monitoring depend on syllable position, Wheeldon and Levelt ( 1995 ) argue that this task taps into a syllabified representation.”
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “However, Levelt assumed the existence of an inner loop as well, which acts upon the phonological representation according to Wheeldon and Levelt (1995).”
On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production (2006, unknown): “These three lines of evidence suggest that performing the articulatory suppression task leaves phonological processing relatively intact (see Wheeldon & Levelt, 1995, for a similar interpretation).”
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. (2002, background): “There is much evidence that speakers scan internal representations – a type of inner speech – for material they have formulated but not yet produced (Levelt, 1983, 1989; Wheeldon & Levelt, 1995).”
Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language (2015, background): “Studies of language production show that prearticulation processes run three or four times faster than actual articulation (Wheeldon and Levelt, 1995).”
Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory. (2001, methodology): “This estimate is based on a study reported in Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) in which participants monitored for the occurrence of segments in target words.”
Impact of Working Memory Constraints on Speech Monitoring in Healthy Children (2013, background): “Later revisions of the theory proposed that the inner loop monitor has access to both the phonetic plan and a more abstract, phonemic and metrical (e.g., pitch, duration, loudness or combinations of these features) representation (Drescher, 2004; et al., 1999; Wheeldon & Levelt, 1995).”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “In Colom´ e’s study, Catalan-Spanish participants were asked to decide whether a given phoneme was present in the Catalan name of the target picture (see also Wheeldon and Levelt, 1995; and Costa, Sebasti´ an-Gall´ es, Pallier and Colom´ e, 2001, for studies in which the phoneme monitoring in spee”
Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. (2008, background): “We hear the speech in our mind, though, through an inner loop that transmits the speech plan at the phonetic (e.g. Levelt, 1983, 1989) and/or phonological (e.g. Wheeldon & Levelt, 1995) level to the speech comprehension system.”
Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters (2006, background): “Wheeldon & Levelt ( 1995 ) found that articulatory suppression failed to interfere with monitoring of internally generated speech.”