Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking: the Effects of Context and Motivation

By Steven J. Sherman, J. Rose, K. Koch, Clark C. Presson, L. Chassin. 2003

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87d262e2ec40d1df279932d6d038a6b22aadad59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? (2006, result): “More recently, similar results with the IAT have been found by Sherman Presson, Chassin, Rose, and Koch ( 2003 , experiment 2) and Huijding, de Jong, Wiers, and Verkooijen (2005).”
Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. (2007, background): “…reaction can be triggered with an opposite effect on a psychophysiological measure, much variance can be expected due to individual differences and associative qualities of specific stimuli (e.g. aspects of a stimulus that highlight positive vs. negative aspects of drugs, cf. Sherman et al., 2003).”
The goal construct in social psychology. (2007, background): “In support of this proposition, Sherman et al. (2003) found for example that chronic cigarette smokers automatically evaluate cigarette paraphernalia more positively when they are in need of a fix, versus when they just recently satisfied the urge.”
On Conceptualizing Self-Control as More Than the Effortful Inhibition of Impulses (2011, background): “Although temptation cues generally elicit spontaneously positive evaluations of indulging in those temptations (e.g., Papies et al., 2007; Sayette & Hufford, 1997; Sherman et al., 2003), Fishbach and colleagues have suggested that people can counter these impulses by activating more negative associa”
What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. (2006, background): “…Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) measure of one’s automatic attitudes can be moderated by current goals or need states; for example cigarette smokers often have a negative implicit attitude towards smoking, but not when it has been a long time since their last cigarette (Sherman et al., 2003).”
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “In his classic article “Attitudes can be measured,” Thurstone (1928) used the term “opinion” to refer to “a verbal expression of attitude” and argued that an opinion merely “symbolizes an attitude” (p.”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, background): “This type of application assumes that the neutral contrasting category contributes no meaningful variability to measurement and thus results in a score that can be interpreted as an absolute assessment of the target concept (e.g., Jajodia & Earlywine, 2003; Sherman et al., 2003).”
The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test (2006, background): “The disparity between the two measures has been found with respect to self-esteem (Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000), attitudes towards condom use (Marsh, Johnson, & Scott-Sheldon, 2001), attitudes towards smoking ( Sherman et al., 2002 ), as well as racial attitudes (Olson & Fazio, 2003).”