It's Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion

By Hakkyun Kim, A. Rao, Angela Y. Lee. 2009

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/873dfaaff698ef40715b84d01e31c30e0671d2b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation (2010, result): “Similar to other research on value derived from fit (Kim, Rao, and Lee 2009), such an account would imply that a greater fit between metacognitive difficulty and special-occasion product context enhances product evaluation.”
Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest? (2014, unknown): “…then responded to additional measures designed to capture perceptions of risk, forthcomingness, and readability, as these may also be affected by the concreteness of language and are possible determinants of willingness to invest (SEC 1998; Kim et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2010; Rennekamp 2012).”
Why Does Psychological Distance Influence Construal Level? The Role of Processing Mode (2016, background): “…construal level, influences outcomes such as preference and choice (Liberman and Trope 1998), emotional reactions (Hong and Lee 2010), persuasion (Kim et al. 2009a), negotiation (Henderson, Trope, and Carnevale 2006b), metacognition (Tsai and Thomas 2011), self-control (Fujita et al. 2006b), and…”
Application of Construal-Level Theory to Promotional Strategies in the Hotel Industry (2016, background): “Kim, Rao, and Lee (2008) examined the effect of construal level on effective message appeals in a voting context.”
“Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective (2016, background): “Such “fitting” messages are therefore more effective at influencing how people act than messages that do not create fit (Kim et al., 2009; White, MacDonnell, & Dahl, 2011).”