The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis

By Lucy J. Hawcroft, T. Milfont. 2010

729 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86e63132ca5db430ef4ad635ba1f985edbc42c58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Ecological Identity: The Development and Assessment of a Measurement Scale (2018, background): “For instance, Hawcroft and Milfont (2010) reported its use in over 69 studies spanning 30 years.”
The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values (2013, methodology): “We decided to use all 15 items of the revised NEP as recommended by Hawcroft and Milfont (2010).”
A meta-analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue (2014, methodology): “According to Hawcroft and Milfont (2010), the procedure of meta-analysis can be described in brief as: (1) a search for studies; (2) selection of studies that meet the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis; and (3) coding the attributes of eligible studies.”
A Comparative Study of Green Purchase Intention between Korean and Chinese Consumers: The Moderating Role of Collectivism (2017, background): “The NEP scale has become one of the most widely used measures of environmental attitude globally and has been undertaken in numerous studies [20].”
Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges (2014, background): “There actually exist dozens of measures of environmental attitude, and these measures have been extensively discussed in the literature (Hawcroft and Milfont 2010).”
Managers’ Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: A Developmental Perspective (2018, methodology): “Since its development in the late 70s, the NEP has been used in various environmental studies, as shown in the meta-analysis conducted by Hawcroft and Milfont (2010).”
Tackling the Complexity of the Pro-environmental Behavior Intentions of Visitors to Turtle Sites (2019, methodology): “To measure NEP, 10 items were obtained from Dunlap, Van Liere, Mertig, and Jones (2000) and Hawcroft and Milfont (2010).”
Exploring the Use of the Revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEP) to Monitor the Development of Students’ Ecological Worldviews (2012, background): “But it is also important to note that comparisons between studies may be problematic, as described by Hawcroft & Milfont (2010).”
Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences (2013, methodology): “The NEP scale is widely used to measure adults’ environmental attitudes (for a review see Hawcroft & Milfont, 2010) and predicts environmental behaviours such as avoiding buying products with unnecessary packaging or sorting household waste for recycling (Olli, Grendstad, & Wollebaek, 2001;…”
Cross-Cultural Evidence for Spatial Bias in Beliefs About the Severity of Environmental Problems (2014, methodology): “For review of cross-cultural studies using this scale, see Hawcroft and Milfont (2010). Environmental Motives Scale (EMS).”
The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling (2016, background): “While participants were generally amicable and respectful, where necessary a range of practical and psychological strategies was used to actively ensure participation, manage potential power dynamics and dominant individuals (e.g. Chambers, 2002; Hogan, 2003).”