A meta-analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping (2020, background): “Also,most of the existing reviews ether donot even examine their literature for these issues, while (Kalimeris et al 2014) note that the inconclusive and inconsistent outcomes might be due to what they call ‘measurement problem’.”
Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications (2021, background): “Moving towards more robustly reported analytical frameworks within rebound studies would allow better comparisons, and eventually meta reviews, such as is common in the energy-GDP causality literature [128].”
A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights (2020, methodology): “However, the direction of the energy-GDP Granger causality is inconclusive, as directionalities differed according to the considered regions, timeframes andmethods used (Ozturk 2010, Stern 2011, Kalimeris et al 2014, Omri 2014, Tiba and Omri 2017).”