The balanced scorecard and intangible assets: similar ideas, unaligned concepts

By Bernard Marr, C. Adams. 2004

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86da9ab74215385b4922e57409c1456caa9e4d65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Basak Denizci
2. Karthik Namasivayam
3. Kwee Keong Choong
4. M. Skoog

In Strategy and Management

1. Basak Denizci
2. Karthik Namasivayam
3. Kwee Keong Choong
4. Ulf Johanson
5. R. Gamayuni
6. Amr Arisha
7. Mohamed A. F. Ragab

Citations in the corpus

• Human capital in service organizations: identifying value drivers (2006, methodology): “Simultaneously, researchers were developing models to define the components of intellectual capital (or intangibles) and to measure them ( Marr and Adams, 2004”
• Balancing dilemmas of the balanced scorecard (2006, background): “There are also a number of papers analyzing the BSC from a less affirmative perspective (e.g. Epstein and Manzoni, 1998; Nörreklit, 2000; Marr and Adams, 2004).”
• Intellectual Capital : Definitions, Categorization and Reporting Models (2008, methodology): “This finding is consistent to Marr and Adams (2004)”