Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK

By Steven Casper, R. Whitley. 2004

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86047683a28e78c3cacca98e36c135ebeba1735a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business (2008, background): “…may also develop in even less favorable institutional contexts in more CMEs (e.g., software and telecoms around Stockholm or biotech firms around Munich) through institutional building at the local level, and strategic deviation from predominant patterns of organization (Casper & Whitley, 2004).”
Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety (2007, background): “The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison.”
APPROPRIABILITY OF INNOVATION RESULTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS (2007, background): “This last idea enables us to propose the following hypothesis:”
From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, background): “I select these sectors because they depend heavily on radical innovation, in which liberal or Anglo-Saxon regimes are often claimed to have an institutional advantage (Hall & Soskice, 2001; cf., for instance, Casper & Whitley, 2004).”
Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism (2009, background): “The de velopment of thera peutic technologies in the biotech no logy industry has been characterized as having high competence destruction risks and appropriabil ity risks that can be lowered successfully by patents (Casper and Whitley 2004).”
Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs (2009, background): “…are characterized by a high level of coordinating and regulating institutions within their economy which impedes the development of radically innovative products (Casper & Whitley, 2004) and therefore makes it more difficult for academic entrepreneurs to achieve their product development goals.”
Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context (2014, background): “…support has taken several forms: development of academic research, competitions, development of frameworks governing skill formation systems and labor market , creation of technological platforms or creation of specific venture funds dedicated to biotechnology ventures (Casper and Whitley, 2004).”
Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory (2013, background): “However, in subsequent use, the focus of the term has widened to include institutions both at the firm and societal level (e.g., Edwards et al. , 2005; Redding, 2005; Redding and Witt, 2007), and even Whitley‘s own usage has been ambiguous (e.g., Casper and Whitley, 2004).”
Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “One indirect impact is to reduce the demand of firms for equity market funds and limit the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) (Bruton, Filatotchev, Chahine, & Wright, 2010; Casper & Whitley, 2004; Lane & Quack, 1999).”
To Be Financed or Not : The Role of Patents for Venture Capital Financing (2009, unknown): “Cohen et al. (2000) have shown that patents provide the primary mechanism for protecting intellectual property.”
How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster (2007, background): “Much comparative institutional research has pinpointed the United States as a country with an ideal institutional infrastructure to support clusters of technology firms (Hall and Soskice, 2001; Casper and Whitley, 2004).”
The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investments: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Challenges (2017, background): “…Bevan and Estrin (2004), Bevan et al. (2004), Bhardwaj et al. (2007), Blonigen et al. (2007), Boudier-Bensebaa (2005), Carstensen and Toubal (2004), Casper and Whitley (2004), Cassidy and AndreossoO’Callaghan (2006), Chan et al. (2006), Cheng and Kwan (2000), Cheng (2006), Cheng and Stough (2006),…”