Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context

By Erkko Autio, Martin Kenney, Philippe Mustar, Donald S. Siegel, Mike Wright. 2014

1,289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/937e413e0a116ed78efd57572a0875aff96ef13d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. David B. Audretsch
2. David Urbano
3. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
4. Maribel Guerrero
5. Maksim Belitski
6. E. Stam
7. E. Malecki
8. Alfredo De Massis

In Economics and Econometrics

1. David Urbano
2. Maribel Guerrero
3. David B. Audretsch
4. Maksim Belitski
5. E. Stam
6. E. Malecki
7. Alain Fayolle
8. Andrew H. Van de Ven

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. David Urbano
2. Maribel Guerrero
3. David B. Audretsch
4. Maksim Belitski
5. E. Stam
6. Alain Fayolle
7. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
8. E. Malecki

Citations in the corpus

• Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview (2019, background): “, electronic, energy, biotechnology, technological sectors) as well as how entrepreneurial innovation could be considered an outcome of effective technology transfer regulations across by regions, countries and continents (Autio et al. 2014).”
• Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, neutral): “While a considerable body of literature investigates individual and firm-level characteristics associated with the success of university spinoffs, recent work emphasizes the importance of context to entrepreneurial innovation writ large (Autio et al. 2014).”
• Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts (2018, background): “For example, science commercialization is often enacted through a process of entrepreneurial innovation as part of which new business opportunities are developed in new or established firms (Autio et al., 2014; Garud, Gehman, & Giuliani, 2014).”
• Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior (2021, neutral): “By so doing, we contribute by responding to recent calls (for example, Welter et al., 2019) for more contextualized theorizing in explaining and predicting new venture development processes (Autio et al., 2014; Zahra, 2007) for which EM is an integral component.”
• Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India (2020, neutral): “12 entrepreneurship (Autio et al., 2014), the underlying goals under which a specific incubator was set up (Bergek and Norrman, 2008), and the different incubation strategies or incubation business”
• Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions (2018, positive): “Indeed, several scholars have highlighted the need to understand entrepreneurship in broader settings, such as their regional, temporal and social arenas (Autio et al. 2014; Spilling 1996; Van de Ven 1993; Zahra and Wright 2011; Zahra et al. 2014; Colombelli et al. 2017).”
• A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design (2017, background): “(2014) presented a framework including public and private actors and proposed the scarcity of the context and entrepreneurial innovation (Autio et al., 2014).”
• Value creation in the quadruple helix: a micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators (2018, neutral): “The aggregation of local resources and factors as well as respective entrepreneurial activities of key stakeholders determine value creation processes, that is, the transformation of various inputs into valuable outcomes (see Autio et al., 2014).”