Naive and primed pluripotent states.
By Jennifer Nichols, Austin G Smith. Cell Stem Cell, 2009
1,855 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85c0928b6959280f9913e8b2b7e78fdcee91ac26
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Richard A. Young
- K. Hochedlinger
- R. Jaenisch
- M. Stadtfeld
- Jennifer Nichols
- Austin G Smith
- José C. R. Silva
- Wolf Reik
Citations in the corpus
- Wnt signaling in development and tissue homeostasis (2018, background): “…in promoting pluripotency in the naive state (Sato et al., 2004; ten Berge et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2016) and differentiation in the primed state (Davidson et al., 2012; Kurek et al., 2015), which is characterized by a distinct epigenetic and gene expression landscape (Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells. (2009, background): “In this regard, it has been suggested that the pluripotent state can be classified in two different ways: ICM-like or “naïve” state, and epiblast-like or “primed” state (Hanna et al., 2010; Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- SOX17 is a Critical Specifier of Human Primordial Germ Cell Fate (2014, background): “Because there are evident differences between the regulation of mouse and human pluripotent ESCs (Hackett and Surani, 2014; Nichols and Smith, 2009) and during their early postimplantation development (de Fellici, 2013; De Miguel et al., 2010; Irie et al., 2014), this might affect the mechanism and…”
- Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. (2010, background): “Murine ESCs established from the ICM of preimplantation blastocysts in the presence of LIF and BMP exist in a more primitive or ‘‘naı̈ve’’ pluripotent state and fulfill all criteria of pluripotency (Table 1; Nichols and Smith 2009).”
- Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. (2011, neutral): “A comprehensive comparison of genetic and epigenetic properties among ESCs, EpiLCs, and EpiSCs would lead to a better understanding of the naive and primed pluripotency (Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo (2009, background): “Neither human ES cells nor EpiSCs exhibit X chromosome reactivation when cultured in 3i/2i, and ultimately fail to survive (Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- Systematic Identification of Culture Conditions for Induction and Maintenance of Naive Human Pluripotency (2014, positive): “The morphological, molecular, and functional similarity between human ESCs and mouse postimplantation epiblast-derived EpiSCs has prompted widespread interest in capturing the equivalent of a naive pluripotent stem cell in humans (De Los Angeles et al., 2012; Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. (2010, background): “This block in PE formation by FGF inhibition is supported by another recent study (Nichols et al., 2009).”
- Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs (2010, background): “mESCs and mEpiSCs are molecularly and epigenetically distinct and therefore represent discrete pluripotent states recently termed naïve and primed pluripotent states, respectively (5).”
- Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State (2009, neutral): “This is a transcriptionally and epigenetically differentiated cell state compared with naive epiblast or ES cells (Nichols and Smith, 2009) that does not revert, even in 2i/LIF.”
- Somatic cell reprogramming and transitions between pluripotent states: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues (2010, neutral): “Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are derived by direct reprogramming of somatic cells in vitro. and Nanog, and they exist in a pre-X-inactivation state with both X chromosomes active in female cells (Nichols and Smith, 2009).”
- Resetting Transcription Factor Control Circuitry toward Ground-State Pluripotency in Human (2014, methodology): “Disposition to collapse reflects the transient nature of naive pluripotency in the embryo (Nichols and Smith, 2009).”