Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds.

By Jeffrey R. Binder, J. A. Frost, T. Hammeke, P. Bellgowan, J. Springer, James C. Kaufman, E. T. Possing. Cerebral Cortex, 2000

1,352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/852a45096338a3007fd9f451e0472cb2b5a43344

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing (2006, background): “…2002; Mechelli et al., 2000; Meyer et al., 2002; Paulesu et al., 2000; Poldrack et al., 1999) Listening, reading, discriminating pseudo-words (11) (Binder et al., 2000; Cappa et al., 1998; Fiez et al., 1996; Herbster et al., 1997; Hickok et al., 2003; Hugdahl et al., 2003; Meyer et al., 2002;…”
Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. (2005, methodology): “More recent studies have confirmed this effect using ERP (see Dehaene-Lambertz & Gliga, 2004), magnetoencephalography (Phillips, Pellathy, & Marantz, 1999), and neuroimaging functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques (Binder et al., 2000; Zatorre, Evans, Meyer, & Gjedde, 1992).”
Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. (2001, background): “In contrast, functional neuroimaging studies of speech perception have drawn attention to the role of lateral auditory projections in speech processing (Binder et al., 1996, 2000; Belin et al., 2000).”
Exploring Ad-Elicited Emotional Arousal and Memory for the Ad Using fMRI (2013, background): “…associated with a variety of functions, including (but not limited to) biological motion (e.g., Grossman et al. 2000), processing of speech (e.g., Binder et al. 2000; Rimol et al. 2005; Uppenkamp et al. 2006), eye gazing (e.g., Hoffman and Haxby 2000), and facial perception (e.g., Ishai,…”
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “The region lateral to HG at the convexity of the STG extending into the STS has been found to respond to acoustic features of phonetic parameters (16), but also to variations of frequency and spectral information in nonspeech sounds (109) and is thus not specialized for speech.”
Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension (2003, result): “Our observation of intelligibility-sensitive regions in the lateral temporal lobe replicates and extends the findings of previous functional imaging studies (Binder et al., 2000; Scott et al., 2000; Vouloumanos et al., 2001).”
What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing?: Insights from a meta-analysis (2011, neutral): “…to syllables compared with listening to noise (Zatorre et al., 1992), categorization of syllables (Poeppel et al., 2004), listening to pseudowords compared with listening to tones (Binder et al., 2000; Fiez et al., 1996) and overt word generation compared with word listening (Price et al., 1996).”
Ventral and dorsal pathways for language (2008, background): “In contrast, attentive listening to aurally presented sentences of meaningful speech versus meaningless pseudo speech was expected to activate areas associated with sentence comprehension in the ventral processing stream (12, 13).”
Modulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech (2002, background): “As well as articulation, generating a word in response to a cue involves phonological and semantic processing, processes that could also account for changes in frontal and temporal activation [Binder et al., 2000; Burton et al., 2000; Poldrack et al., 1999; Wise et al., 1999].”
Prelexical and lexical processing in listening (2004, neutral): “The use of control conditions, such as tones (Binder et al., 2000; Jäncke et al., 2002), noise bursts (Jäncke et al., 2002), or vowels (Benson et al., 2001; Jäncke et al., 2002), leads to a shift of activation maxima (Figure 3, green) away from the auditory cortex.”
The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution (2008, background): “(2003) and Buchsbaum et al. (2001) show that the parietal lobe does not meet the minimal logical requirements for the ‘‘neural correlate’’ of the phonological store because it does not activate during both auditory perception and covert rehearsal. Second, these studies show that the two regions that”