Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'.
By R. Wise, Sophie K. Scott, S. Blank, C. Mummery, Kevin Murphy, Elizabeth A. Warburton. Brain : a journal of neurology, 2001
555 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38375df877c80239332b30a0c4b35f6f1e52e27f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Gregory Hickok
- Olaf Sporns
- David Poeppel
- Stephen M. Smith
- Cathy J. Price
- Angela D. Friederici
- B. Buchsbaum
Citations in the corpus
- A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012, background): “Celsis et al. (1999) reported a common response to speech and nonspeech stimuli in the upper surface of the gyrus but Wise et al. (2001) identified a more ventral region in the left lateral posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS in Fig.”
- Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt (2003, background): “Another recent report has identified the left posterior dorsal STG (our Spt) as a site active during the motor act of speech ( Wise et al., 2001).”
- The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. (2003, unknown): “With respect to the posterior portion of the superior temporal lobe Wise et al. (Wise et al., 2001) proposed that this region might be involved in the transient representation of phonetic sequences, independent of whether or not these sequences constitute intelligible speech.”
- The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “Functional imaging studies have, moreover, shown that PT also does not react specifically to speech sounds, at least compared with equally complex nonspeech sounds (48, 261, 266).”
- The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution (2008, background): “motor interface in the speech domain has been motivated (Hickok & Poeppel, 2000, 2007; Pa et al., 2007; Wise et al., 2001), in part, by the discovery of a neural system for sensory–motor integration in the visual sys-”
- Phonetic Perception and the Temporal Cortex (2002, result): “The activations within the left STS specific to the CV syllables were located ventrally and slightly anterior to HG in a position roughly similar to the response peaks found in recent speech perception studies of words, pseudowords, and reversed speech (Binder et al., 2000; Wise et al., 2001; Scott ”
- Disfluency in Swedish human–human and human–machine travel booking dialogues (2004, background): “Wise et al. (2001) re-analyzed four functional neuroimaging studies, and found that non-speech and speech sounds (including the subject’s own voice) activated the supratemporal cortical plane, while activity “in its most posterior and medial part, at the junction with the inferior parietal lobe, was”
- Association fibre pathways of the brain: parallel observations from diffusion spectrum imaging and autoradiography. (2007, background): “, 1981; Rauschecker and Tian, 2000), functional imaging studies in humans (Martinkauppi et al., 2000; Rauschecker and Tian, 2000; Wise et al., 2001) and clinical observations (Clarke et al.”
- Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking (2006, background): “The empirical data that support the notion of hemispheric lateralization for the expressive component of language have been obtained from clinical case studies and neuroimaging studies involving primarily covert language production tasks (Petersen et al., 1988; Caplan et al., 1995, 1998; Burton et a”
- Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. (2009, background): “…primarily to speech perception and phonological processing rather than to retrieval of word meaning (Henschen 1918--1919; Binder et al. 2000; Wise et al. 2001; Binder 2002; Hickok et al. 2003; Scott and Johnsrude 2003; Indefrey and Levelt 2004; Liebenthal et al. 2005; Buchsbaum and…”
- Large, colorful, or noisy? Attribute- and modality-specific activations during retrieval of perceptual attribute knowledge (2001, background): “pothesized to index speech-specific auditory processing and, perhaps, to reflect speech-based short-term auditory storage mechanisms (Fiez et al., 1996; see also Binder et al., 1997; Paulesu, Frith, & Frackowiak, 1993; Wise et al., 2001 ).”