School Mathematics Reform, Constructivism, and Literacy: A Case for Literacy Instruction in the Reform-Oriented Math Classroom.
By Roni Jo Draper. 2002
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84763535c15133dbe45b92cd2917883005372d5d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Differentiated instruction: are Hong Kong in-service teachers ready? (2016, background): “…Bruner, 1960; Brooks & Brooks, 1993; Dewey, 1910; Erickson, 1998; Piaget, 1969; Wiggins & McTighe, 1998), emphasising students as active learners who ‘create their own knowledge based on interactions with their environment including their interactions with other people’ (Draper, 2002, p. 522).”
- Mathematics Intervention for Grades 5–11: Teaching Mathematics, Reading, or Both? (2006, background): “However, mathematics is one subject area where it often proves difficult to incorporate reading instruction (Borasi, Siegel, Fonzi, & Smith, 1998; Draper, 2002).”
- Comparison of teacher educators' instructional methods with the constructivist ideal (2007, background): “Although reform movements have appeared periodically within the K—12 educational system over the last 100 years, schools within the United States are currently feeling the impact of a mathematics reform movement based on constructivist learning theory (Draper, 2002).”