Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial

By J. Green, T. Charman, Helen McConachie, C. Aldred, V. Slonims, P. Howlin, A. Le Couteur, K. Leadbitter, K. Hudry, S. Byford and 4 more. The Lancet, 2010

748 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary Background Results of small trials suggest that early interventions for social communication are effective for the treatment of autism in children. We therefore investigated the efficacy of such an intervention in a larger trial. Methods Children with core autism (aged 2 years to 4 years and 11 months) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to a parent-mediated communication-focused (Preschool Autism Communication Trial [PACT]) intervention or treatment as usual at three specialist centres in the UK. Those assigned to PACT were also given treatment as usual. Randomisation was by use of minimisation of probability in the marginal distribution of treatment centre, age (≤42 months or >42 months), and autism severity (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic [ADOS-G] algorithm score 12–17 or 18–24). Primary outcome was severity of autism symptoms (a total score of social communication algorithm items from ADOS-G, higher score indicating greater severity) at 13 months. Complementary secondary outcomes were measures of parent-child interaction, child language, and adaptive functioning in school. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN58133827. Results 152 children were recruited. 77 were assigned to PACT (London [n=26], Manchester [n=26], and Newcastle [n=25]); and 75 to treatment as usual (London [n=26], Manchester [n=26], and Newcastle [n=23]). At the 13-month endpoint, the severity of symptoms was reduced by 3·9 points (SD 4·7) on the ADOS-G algorithm in the group assigned to PACT, and 2·9 (3·9) in the group assigned to treatment as usual, representing a between-group effect size of −0·24 (95% CI −0·59 to 0·11), after adjustment for centre, sex, socioeconomic status, age, and verbal and non-verbal abilities. Treatment effect was positive for parental synchronous response to child (1·22, 0·85 to 1·59), child initiations with parent (0·41, 0·08 to 0·74), and for parent-child shared attention (0·33, −0·02 to 0·68). Effects on directly assessed language and adaptive functioning in school were small. Interpretation On the basis of our findings, we cannot recommend the addition of the PACT intervention to treatment as usual for the reduction of autism symptoms; however, a clear benefit was noted for parent-child dyadic social communication. Funding UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/839d3fd9c05f0f77644d677935f29b3e9632d742

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions: Empirically Validated Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015, background): “Indeed, in a study involving the largest RCT of young children using a NDBI approach (Green et al. 2010), parent synchronization to child activity mediated child outcomes).”
Distance Video-Teleconferencing in Early Intervention (2013, background): “…in parent verbal responsiveness have been targeted in intervention programs for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) but with considerable variation in efficacy (Green et al., 2010; Ingersoll & Gergans, 2007; Venker, McDuffie, Ellis Weismer, & Abbeduto, 2012; Yoder & Stone, 2006).”