Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction
By A. Ducasse, Annie Brown. 2009
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8364450838f99d736c08a81dbb3446b7c0077076
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence (2018, background): “For example, Ducasse and Brown (2009) observed that supportive audible feedback2 can and has been used by candidates to mask their non-comprehension of co-participants’ talk, such that raters “might potentially jump either way with such behaviour, interpreting them positively (providing…”
- Interactional Competence across Proficiency Levels: How do Learners Manage Interaction in Paired Speaking Tests? (2014, background): “Evidence from Ducasse and Brown (2009), as well as anecdotal evidence from this study, has suggested that non-verbal features such as gaze and body at U niversity of C am bridge L ocal E xam inations Syndicate on January 20, 2014 http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from language are part…”
- Interactional Competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features Salient to Raters (2011, background): “In addition, the emergence of body language as a feature of the interaction salient to raters supports findings by Ducasse and Brown (2009).”