Using Formal Client Feedback to Improve Retention and Outcome: Making Ongoing, Real-time Assessment Feasible

By Scott D. Miller, B. Duncan, Jeb Brown, Ryan Sorrell, M. Chalk. 2006

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8315c783b6c64f95dbcd82cd025599dc7d1205d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. D. Haan
2. A. Duckworth
3. D. Birch
4. Claire Jones
5. B. Duncan
6. Adam M. Grant
7. Sina Gessnitzer
8. Gil Bozer

Citations in the corpus

• The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project (2012, methodology): “The first (Miller et al., 2006) was a quasi-experimental, ABB design; the other three were between-subjects, RCTs. Miller et al. (2006) explored the impact of feedback in a large (n 6424) culturally diverse sample utilizing a telephonic EAP.”
• EXECUTIVE COACHING OUTCOME RESEARCH: THE CONTRIBUTION OF COMMON FACTORS SUCH AS RELATIONSHIP, PERSONALITY MATCH, AND SELF-EFFICACY (2013, background): “As in Perkins (2009), this study may suffer from researcher bias, as the external coaches/tutors did the scoring of team playing effectiveness. Evers, Brouwers, and Tomic (2006) measured self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectancies with three items for each.”