Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators
By Yong Feng, Xinghuo Yu, Zhihong Man. at - Automatisierungstechnik, 2002
2,181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/826d4d086f38deaa106ad8d3984c25d271fd69d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Adaptive Sliding Mode Disturbance Observer-Based Composite Control With Prescribed Performance of Space Manipulators for Target Capturing (2019, background): “Similar to the works [40] and [41], now we will prove that ż = 0 is not an attractor.”
- Robust Finite-Time Consensus Tracking Algorithm for Multirobot Systems (2009, background): “Remark 3: It has been seen in (35) that, this TSM surface is the conventional TSM proposed in [13].”
- Practical Nonsingular Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Robot Manipulators for High-Accuracy Tracking Control (2009, methodology): “In equation (26), since p and q are positive odd integers and 1 < p/q < 2, ė i > 0 for ėi = 0 [23].”
- Adaptive attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence (2013, neutral): “…(TSM) s = ẋ+kx r1 r2 (k > 0, 0 < r1r2 < 1) (Venkataraman & Gulati, 1991), r1 > 0, r2 > 0 are odd integers, and NTSM s = x + k− r1 r2 ẋ r2 r1 (k > 0, 1 r2r1 2) in Feng, Yu, and Man (2002), have been developed widely that enables the system states to approach equilibrium in finite time.”
- Derivative and integral terminal sliding mode control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems (2012, background): “Unfortunately,most of nonsingular TSMCmethods (e.g., Feng et al., 2002, Hirzinger, 2000, Zhao, Li, & Gao, 2008) are available only for second-order systems (indeed, robotic manipulators received the most attention).”
- Distributed finite-time attitude containment control for multiple rigid bodies (2010, positive): “However, this sliding surface might lead the control torque to contain the term diag(σ α ′ −1 i )σ̇ i and hence results in a singularity when σ i = 0 but σ̇ i ≠ 0 (Feng et al., 2002).”
- Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Systems (2016, methodology): “For rigid manipulators, a global nonsingular terminal sliding mode controller was presented in [49], and a higher order SMC scheme was proposed in [50] for uncertain nonlinear systems.”
- Practical Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators With Continuous Fractional-Order Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode (2016, methodology): “Afterwards, evolved versions of TSM, such as fast TSM [16], nonsingular TSM (NTSM) [17], continuous nonsingular TSM [14], had been proposed and investigated.”
- Neural-Network-Based Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Robotic Manipulators Including Actuator Dynamics (2009, methodology): “Moreover, the controllers proposed in [9] and [10] used computed torque control law and needed the knowledge about model characteristics and parameters.”
- Adaptive finite-time control of nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainty (2006, background): “In recent years, finite-time stabilization controllers have been investigated for a number of class of systems [2], [4], [5], [7]–[9].”
- Time-varying feedback for regulation of normal-form nonlinear systems in prescribed finite time (2017, background): “…global finite-time stabilization of strict feedback systems; Polyakov and Poznyak (2009) present a sign function based (discontinuous) controller; Feng, Yu, and Man (2002) design a non-singular terminal sliding controller for robot systems; Shen and Huang (2009) present a global finite-time…”