An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes

By C. Aberson, Amber M. Gaffney. 2009

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/820b668e80f2e57e77bca77be8e18a53cfedb047

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’ (2009, background): “Aberson and Gaffney ( 2008 ) remove negative stereotyping from the main framework and examine the role of positive intergroup contact on threat and how the various forms of threat impact on the creation of both implicit and explicit attitudes to outgroups.”
Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice (2015, background): “In one study, factor analyses of scales including measures of both forms of contact demonstrate the presence of independent constructs and negligible correlations between the two measures (Aberson & Gaffney, 2009; r = −.05).”
Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present (2014, background): “Previous work on valence asymmetries has focused on the psychological consequences of direct, face-to-face contact in significant but peaceful settings (e.g. Aberson & Gaffney, 2009; Barlow et al., 2012; Dhont & Van Hiel, 2009; Paolini et al., 2010).”
The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1 (2017, background): “But other studies have found the effect of positive contact on prejudice to be larger than that of negative contact (e.g., Aberson & Gaffney, 2009; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2011; Pettigrew, Tropp, Wagner, & Christ, 2011).”
Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry (2018, unknown): “…effects for positive contact (Fell et al., 2016; Pettigrew, Tropp, Wagner, & Christ, 2011), and others finding little difference between positive and negative contact (Aberson & Gaffney, 2009; Bekhuis, Ruiter, & Coenders, 2013; Mazziotta, Rohmann, Wright, De Tezanos Pinto, & Lutterbach, 2015).”
Intergroup Anxiety (2014, background): “Several studies indicate that negative contact is positively correlated with intergroup anxiety (Aberson & Gaffney, 2008; Corenblum & Stephan, 2001; Rohmann et al., 2006; C. W. Stephan et al., 2000; W. G. Stephan et al., 2002).”
Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice (2011, background): “This finding might be especially important because feelings of anxiety and threat typically arise in settings where direct contact is limited or negative (Aberson & Gaffney, 2009; Stephan et al., 2002).”