The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions (2017, background): “However, the merits of this “demobilization” perspective are debated (e.g., Pettigrew & Hewstone, 2017), and future research in this area might thus productively examine (a) the specific psychological mechanisms through which contact affects social change orientations; (b) the conditions under…”
Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration (2018, background): “…research trends is in mantras from introductory methodology and stats classes: Whenever possible, we should ensure that field studies are carried out in a multivariate environment and results are interpreted with a multivariate lens (see Pettigrew & Hewstone, 2017, for a related point).”
How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking (2020, background): “Finally, we consider a more general criticism by Pettigrew and Hewstone (2017).”
Social Psychological Perspectives on Trump Supporters (2017, unknown): “750 (Pettigrew & Hewstone, 2017).”